Maler By and Through Maler v. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc.
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Before SCHWARTZ; PER CURIAM |
| Citation | Maler By and Through Maler v. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc., 532 So.2d 79, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2344 (Fla. App. 1988) |
| Decision Date | 18 October 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-1771,87-1771 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2344 James MALER, Jr., a minor child By and Through his mother and natural guardian Joni MALER, individually, and James Maler, Sr., individually, Appellants, v. BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC. and David Gair, M.D., Appellees. |
Adams, Hunter, Angones, Adams, Adams & McClure and Christopher Lynch, Miami, for appellants.
Parenti & Falk and Hayes G. Wood, Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Steven E. Stark, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
We reverse the order under review and remand for further proceedings upon a holding that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to consider an affidavit of good cause filed by the plaintiffs/appellants one day prior to the hearing on the defendants/appellees' motions to dismiss for lack of prosecution under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e) because no prejudice to the defendants/appellees was shown due to the aforesaid late-filed affidavit (the affidavit was filed four days late under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e)), see Shanley v. Allen, 346 So.2d 548, 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), and (2) the subject affidavit states good cause for the lack of record activity for over one year in the instant case because it appears, without dispute, there was extensive record activity in an identical lawsuit between the same parties, the instant lawsuit being a "protective" lawsuit in the event the other lawsuit was dismissed. See American Eastern Corp. v. Henry Blanton, Inc., 382 So.2d 863, 865 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Estate of Mills v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 378 So.2d 301, 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); cf. Funke v. Lopez, 432 So.2d 787, 788 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (); Perez v. Cohen, 362 So.2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Insua v. Chantres
...for apparent non-activity, precluding dismissal for failure to prosecute under Rule 1.420(e). See Maler v. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc., 532 So.2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Estate of Mills v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 378 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Smith v. Saint George Island Gulf Beaches,......
-
Maler By and Through Maler v. Barad
...was then, and is still pending against other defendants, Baptist Hospital, Inc. and Dr. David Gair. See Maler ex rel. Maler v. Baptist Hosp., Inc., 532 So.2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The basis of this contention was the theory that if Maler recovered a judgment in that case, he would no longe......
-
Morales v. Sperry Rand Corp.
...He reasons that the delay was beyond his control and that in any event the appellees were not prejudiced. See Maler v. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc., 532 So.2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Middleton v. Silverman, 430 So.2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA The appellees assert that the prejudice issue was not spec......
-
Seabury v. Cheminova, Inc.
...642 So.2d 818 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)). The Third District's philosophy is also apparent in several other decisions from that court, including Maler by and through Maler v. Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc., 532 So.2d 79, 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), in which the court held that the plaintiff had demons......