Malesev v. Board of County Road Com'rs of Wayne County
| Decision Date | 01 March 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,Docket No. 14287,1 |
| Citation | Malesev v. Board of County Road Com'rs of Wayne County, 215 N.W.2d 598, 51 Mich.App. 511 (Mich. App. 1974) |
| Parties | Milos MALESEV and Sophie Malesev, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF WAYNE, Michigan, a public body corporate, et al., Defendants-Appellees |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan |
Richard A. Monash, Detroit, for plaintiffs-appellants.
John A. Kruse, Harvey, Kruse & Westen, P.C., Detroit, for defendants-appellees.
Before McGREGOR, P.J., and J. H. GILLIS and O'HARA,* JJ.
This is an action for damage to property based on a third-party beneficiary contract theory. The defendants contracted with each other for construction of a water-in-take tunnel in and through the City of Lincoln Park. Construction was completed on October 18, 1960. In November, 1963, due to soil instability caused by the construction, cracks and other structural damage to the plaintiffs' residence first became apparent. Complaint was thereafter filed on December 1, 1965. An order dismissing that complaint, as barred by the statute of limitations, was entered on April 14, 1972, and the plaintiffs appeal as of right.
The statute of limitations is three years in all actions for injury to person or property, whether they sound in contract or tort. State Mutual Cyclone Insurance Co. v. O & A Electric Cooperative, 381 Mich. 318, 161 N.W.2d 573 (1968). In relevant part, M.C.L.A. § 600.5827; M.S.A. § 27A.5827 provides:
Our Supreme Court has construed this to mean that, in the case of tortious injury to persons, 'wrong' meant 'actionable wrong' and accrued when injuries first became apparent. Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co., 388 Mich. 146, 200 N.W.2d 70 (1972). The same rule should apply to injury to property. To hold otherwise would transmute the statute from one of limitation into one of abolition. Since the damage in this case did not become apparent until over three years after completion of the tunnel, the plaintiffs' cause of action would then be destroyed before it arose. Such a result is not consonant with the legislative purpose of the statute.
Reversed.
* MICHAEL D. O'HARA, former Supreme Court Justice, sitting on the Court of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Poly-Flex Const., Inc. v. Neyer, Tiseo & Hindo
...a discovery rule of accrual. McCann v. Brody-Built Const. Co., 496 N.W.2d 349 [(Mich.App.1992)]. See also Malesev v. Board of County Road Comm'rs, 215 N.W.2d 598 [(Mich.App. 1974)] (cause of action for property damage does not accrue until the damage becomes The "discovery rule" would there......
-
Siragusa v. Brown
...Such a result is not consonant with the legislative purpose of the statute.' " Id. (quoting Malasev v. Bd. of County Road Comm'rs, 51 Mich.App. 511, 215 N.W.2d 598, 599 (Mich.Ct.App.1974)). More recently, in Petersen v. Bruen, 106 Nev. 271, 792 P.2d 18 (1990), we commented on the distinctio......
-
Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v. Sal E. Lobianco & Son Co., Inc.
...negligent act. (See Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick, 51 N.J. 130, 238 A.2d 169, 172--74 (1968) and Malesev v. Bd. of County Road Commissioners, 51 Mich.App. 511, 215 N.W.2d 598, 599 (1974). And compare Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick, supra, 51 N.J. 130, 238 A.2d at pp. 176--77 with Willi......
-
Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.
...of Cal. v. Hartford Accident & Indemn. Co., 21 Cal.3d 624, 147 Cal.Rptr. 486, 581 P.2d 197, 200 (1978); Malesev v. Bd. of County Road Comm'rs, 51 Mich.App. 511, 215 N.W.2d 598 (1974). See Thompson v. Nebraska Mobile Homes Corp., 647 P.2d 334, 338 Respondent attempts to distinguish the cases......