Malloy v. State

Decision Date09 September 2014
Docket NumberNo. A14A1957.,A14A1957.
Citation329 Ga.App. 38,763 S.E.2d 501
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
PartiesMALLOY v. The STATE.

Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Brian Fenton McEvoy, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, Donald Franklin Samuel, Atlanta, for Appellant.

Nancy Bailey Allstrom, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert D. James, Jr., Dist. Atty., Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., for Appellee.

Opinion

ELLINGTON, Presiding Judge.

In the Superior Court of DeKalb County, a jury found Dr. Tyrone Malloy guilty of two counts of Medicaid fraud1 and the court sentenced him to serve four years in prison. Prior to filing his motion for a new trial, Malloy sought an appeal bond, which the court denied following a hearing. Malloy appeals from the order denying bond,2 contending that he presented sufficient evidence demonstrating that he was not a flight risk. For the following reasons, we affirm.

1. “There is no constitutional right to bond pending appeal. Whether to grant an appeal bond to eligible [ 3 ] felony defendants lies within the sound discretion of the convicting court, and we will not disturb the court's decision absent a flagrant abuse of discretion.” (Footnotes omitted.) Luke v. State, 282 Ga.App. 749, 750, 639 S.E.2d 645 (2006).

In exercising its discretion, the trial court must answer four questions: (1) whether there is a substantial risk the defendant will flee; (2) whether there is a substantial risk the defendant will pose a danger to others in the community; (3) whether there is a substantial risk the defendant will intimidate witnesses or otherwise interfere with the administration of justice; and (4) whether it appears the appeal is frivolous or taken only for the purpose of delay. An affirmative answer to any one of these questions will support the trial court's decision to deny an appeal bond.
(Footnotes omitted.) Abernathy v. State, 245 Ga.App. 857, 857–858, 539 S.E.2d 203 (2000) ; see also Birge v. State, 238 Ga. 88, 230 S.E.2d 895 (1976).

The defendant bears the burden of persuading the court to grant an appeal bond, and the court should not grant bond “unless the defendant presents sufficient information, evidence, or argument to convince the trial court that none of the four factors applies.” (Footnote omitted.) Abernathy v. State, 245 Ga.App. at 858, 539 S.E.2d 203. See also Moore v. State, 151 Ga.App. 413, 414, 260 S.E.2d 350 (1979) (accord). In addition to any evidence offered by the defendant, “the trial judge may consider all the evidence adduced at the trial that is pertinent to [the appeal bond] determination[.] (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Williford v. State, 218 Ga.App. 522, 523, 462 S.E.2d 632 (1995). “Whether we agree with [the trial court's] findings and conclusions is not controlling.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Hardy v. State, 192 Ga.App. 860, 861(2), 386 S.E.2d 731 (1989) (physical precedent only). Thus, as long as there is some evidence to support the trial court's decision,4 we will not disturb it. See Abernathy v. State, 245 Ga.App. at 857–858, 539 S.E.2d 203.

In this case, the court denied Malloy's request for bond by affirmatively finding that there was a substantial risk that Malloy would flee.5 Although Malloy presented evidence of his community ties, the trial court stated that it was not persuaded by Malloy's assurances. Given that Malloy was convicted of Medicaid fraud, a crime involving deceit and the theft of public funds, the court's distrust of Malloy's assurances is reasonably based in record evidence. Also, at sentencing, Malloy showed no acceptance of the jury's verdict and little understanding that it warranted criminal punishment, stating “I would not have sacrificed all of the things that I have done if I had intent to defraud Medicaid. I feel that my contribution of what I felt a doctor should be and should do was what I've accomplished in 37 years. In no way was I trying to do something that was illegal.” The record also contains evidence that Malloy is older, wealthy, and has family and business connections outside of Georgia, connections that may provide him refuge or aid. Given that some record evidence supports the court's decision to deny Malloy an appeal bond, we cannot say that the trial court manifestly abused its discretion. See Williford v. State, 218 Ga.App. at 524, 462 S.E.2d 632.

2. Malloy's motion to expedite this appeal is denied as moot.

Judgment affirmed.

PHIPPS, C.J., concurs.

McMILLIAN, J., concurs in judgment only.

1 OCGA § 49–4–146.1(b)(2) makes it unlawful for any person or Medicaid provider “knowingly and willfully to accept medical assistance payments to which he or she is not entitled or in an amount greater than that to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Stroud v. Hall Cnty., A16A1062
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 2016
    ... ... hearsay and Don Stroud's testimony about the value of his property as a building lot did not state a proper 339 Ga.App. 40basis for his opinion. The trial court also found that the action was barred ... ...
  • Austin v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 5, 2017
    ... ... presented to the court at the time the plea was entered, and reflected that the "crime[s] involv[ed] deceit and the theft of public funds," Malloy v. State, 329 Ga. App. 38, 40 (1), 763 S.E.2d 501 (2014) (physical precedent only), on six separate occasions, with regard to the accounts of six ... ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Real Property
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 67-1, September 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...at 614, 760 S.E.2d at 216-17.161. 329 Ga. App. 29, 763 S.E.2d 498 (2014).162. Id. at 30, 763 S.E.2d at 500.163. Id.164. Id. at 31-32, 763 S.E.2d at 501.165. Id. at 32, 763 S.E.2d at 501.166. This section is authored by Betsy N. Burns, attorney in the law firm of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Ca......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT