Malone v. Conner, 19650

Decision Date18 April 1963
Docket NumberNo. 19650,No. 1,19650,1
Citation189 N.E.2d 590,1 Ind.Dec. 288,135 Ind.App. 167
PartiesLeslie A. MALONE, Administrator of the Estate of Sylvester Malone, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ronald J. CONNER, Appellee
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Russell S. Armstrong, Evansville, for appellant.

Bamberger, Foreman, Oswald & Hahn, Evansville, for appellee.

CLEMENTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on an order of the Warrick Circuit Court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff-appellant's second amended complaint.

The appellant alleges that he is the duly appointed and acting administrator of the estate of Sylvester Malone, deceased; that his decedent was injured by the negligence of the defendant-appellee on the 24th day of June, 1958, and that on November 10, 1960, he died from causes other than the personal injuries received June 24, 1958.

The legal question before this court is: Does § 2-403, Burns' 1962 Cum.Supp., effective March 13, 1959, give a cause of action to the appellant, Leslie A. Malone, Administrator, for reasonable medical, hospital and nursing expenses, and loss of income from the date of injury to the date of death, granting that no such right of action existed at the time of the injury?

On June 24, 1958, the date of the injury, the governing statute read as follows:

'All causes of action shall survive, and may be brought, notwithstanding the death of the person entitled or liable to such action, by or against the representative of the deceased party, except actions for personal injuries to the deceased party * * *.' Acts 1955, ch. 257, § 1, p. 666.

On March 13, 1959, the above statute was amended by adding the following:

'* * * which shall survive only to the extent provided herein. * * * Provided, however, That when a person receives personal injuries caused by the wrongful act or omission of another and thereafter dies from causes other than said personal injuries so received, the personal representative of the person so injured may maintain an action against the wrongdoer to recover damages * * * only the reasonable medical, hospital and nursing expense and loss of income of said injured person, resulting from such injury, from the date of the injury to the date of his death.' Acts 1959, ch. 309, § 1, pp. 786, 787.

Does the above statute, as amended and effective March 13, 1959, operate retroactively and become effective as of June 24, 1958, or is it prospective giving a right of action to such injuries and death occurring after March 13, 1959?

Statutes are to be construed as having a prospective operation unless the language clearly indicates that they were intended to be retrospective. City of Indianapolis, etc. v. Wynn et al. (1959), 239 Ind. 567, 575, 157 N.E.2d 828, 159 N.E.2d 572; Chadwick, Treasurer v. City of Crawfordsville (1940), 216 Ind. 399, 413, 24 N.E.2d 937, 129 A.L.R. 469; Jackson, Sec'y. v. Pittsburgh, etc. R. Co. (1923), 193 Ind. 157, 165, 139 N.E. 320; Tecumseh, etc., Mining Co. v. Buck (1922), 192 Ind. 122, 130, 135 N.E. 481; Hibler v. Globe Amer. Corp. (1958), 128 Ind.App. 156, 166, 147 N.E.2d 19.

Where retroactive operation of remedial statutes is necessary to carry out the purpose of the new law, and no new rights are given or existing rights taken away, and only a new remedy is afforded for the enforcement of an existing right, the statutes may be given a retroactive operation. A retroactive statute must not take away an existing right or give a new right, but can only provide a new remedy to enforce an existing right. See: 26 I.L.E. Statutes § 195, p. 379.

In Herrick v. Sayler (1957), (C.C.A. 7th) 245 F.2d 171, at page 174, a diversity case in which the court looked to the policy of the law in Indiana, it is said:

'In other jurisdictions...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • In re Hershman
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • March 31, 2009
    ...McGill v. Muddy Fork of Silver Creek Watershed Conservancy Dist., 175 Ind.App. 48, 370 N.E.2d 365, 370 (1977); Malone v. Conner, 135 Ind.App. 167, 189 N.E.2d 590, 591 (1963), trans. denied. However, this formulation is inconsistent with this Court's precedent. As further stated by the India......
  • Pathman Const. Co. v. Knox County Hospital Ass'n
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • May 5, 1975
    ...and no new rights are given or existing ones removed. See Herrick v. Sayler (7th Cir. 1957), 245 F.2d 171; Malone v. Conner (1963), 135 Ind.App. 167, 189 N.E.2d 590. DECISION Whatever the validity of such arguments they are of no effect in the case at bar, where the Uniform Arbitration Act ......
  • Pier v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • March 22, 1983
    ...prospective operation unless legislative language clearly indicates the statute was intended to be retrospective. Malone v. Conner (1963), 135 Ind.App. 167, 189 N.E.2d 590; therefore, as a general rule, we apply the statute which is in effect when the crime is committed. Wolfe v. State (197......
  • Dowdell v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • November 5, 1975
    ...it will be presumed that the legislature intended the statute to operate prospectively and not retroactively. See Malone v. Conner (1963), 135 Ind.App. 167, 189 N.E.2d 590. We conclude that the modification of Dowdell's sentence to an indeterminate term of not less than ten (10) years nor m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT