Manegold v. Beaven
Decision Date | 07 November 1914 |
Docket Number | 109 |
Citation | 189 Ala. 241,66 So. 448 |
Parties | MANEGOLD et al. v. BEAVEN. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from City Court of Montgomery; Armstead Brown, Judge.
Suit by Estelle Manegold Beaven against George Manegold and others to impeach a decree for fraud. From a decree overruling demurrers to the bill, defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded.
A general statement of facts will be found in the opinion. The following are the paragraphs of the bill referred to:
Daniel W. Troy and Frank Stollenwerck, Jr., both of Montgomery, for appellants.
Holloway & MacKenzie, of Montgomery, for appellee.
DE GRAFFENRIED, J.
We make the statement of the facts in this case from the allegations of the bill of complaint. The case is here on appeal from a decree of a court of equity overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint.
The complainant is the daughter and only child of Joseph Manegold, who died in November, 1898. Complainant's mother died several years before the death of the father, and she was only 11 years old when her father died. Joseph Manegold married about a month before his death, and at the time of his death his widow, Clara J. Manegold, and complainant were the only members of his household. After his death the residence in which he died was set apart to said widow and minor daughter as a homestead. They continued to live together in said home, and the relations of mother and daughter appear to have been fully established between them. Indeed, shortly after the death of her said husband, the said Clara J. Manegold qualified as the guardian of her said stepdaughter and assumed legal control of all of her pecuniary affairs. On the 18th day of February, 1901, the said widow, Clara J. Manegold, married George Manegold, the brother of her deceased husband, and the uncle of her said stepdaughter and ward. The new husband established himself in the home of his deceased brother and became the head of his said deceased brother's family. He was thus not only the husband of the complainant's stepmother, the woman who occupied for her the place of mother, but he was a brother of her father and her uncle by blood. He became the head of her household and was, out of respect to the double relationship, the recipient of her complete trust. She alleges, in fact, that she reposed the same confidence in him that a daughter is accustomed to repose in her own father, and that she entertained for him the same affection which a child is accustomed to entertain towards his or her own parents.
Some time in the latter part of the year 1906, it developed that her said guardian, the stepmother, had in her hands $12,316.46 of complainant's funds; that $3,300 of this money was properly invested in notes secured by mortgages; and that the balance of the fund had been loaned by her to Joseph Manegold & Co., a mercantile firm composed of said George Manegold and the said Clara J. Manegold, without security. In other words, it then developed that the stepmother and guardian and her said husband, the uncle of complainant, were then using about $9,000 of complainant's funds in a mercantile business, and there had been taken for the ward no independent security therefor. Shortly after this development, the said Clara J. Manegold resigned her guardianship and delivered into the registry of the court the said mortgages and $12,316.46 in cash, which represented all with which, as guardian, the said widow, Clara J. Manegold, was chargeable. She was thereupon discharged as guardian, and George Manegold, the husband, was appointed guardian in her stead. He executed a bond as guardian in the sum of $25,000, with the respondent the American Bonding Company of Baltimore as his surety thereon, and thereupon, on or about the 26th day of January, 1907, the said mortgages and the said $12,316.46 were turned over to him, and from that time the said George Manegold, as guardian, managed and controlled the estate of his said ward. Complainant reached her majority on the 19th day of October, 1908, and on the 20th day of October, 1908, the day after she became of age, the said George Manegold obtained from her a receipt for $14,357.15. This receipt is in the following language:
Subsequently, on August 6, 1909, a consent decree was rendered by the city court of Montgomery discharging the said George Manegold and the surety on his bond, and by said decree the guardianship was finally settled. On file with this consent decree is the following paper:
"I, Estelle Manegold, having become of age on October 19, 1908, and having received full settlement from George Manegold, do hereby consent that the court make the above decree."
The decree is based upon an account which was filed in said city court and that account is credited with $14,357.15...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gill v. More
...535, 53 So. 272; Dixie Grain Co. v. Quinn, 181 Ala. 208, 61 So. 886; Kant v. A., B. & A.R. Co., 189 Ala. 48, 66 So. 598; Manegold v. Beavan, 189 Ala. 241, 66 So. 448; Wheat v. Wheat, 190 Ala. 461, 67 So. 417; v. Butler, 192 Ala. 287, 68 So. 369, Ann.Cas.1916D, 815; Stewart v. Snider, 72 So.......
-
Duncan v. Johnson
...to section 6608, Code, as limited by the one year statute, section 8966, Code. Nichols v. Dill, 222 Ala. 455, 132 So. 900; Manegold v. Beavan, 189 Ala. 241, 66 So. 448; Gordon v. Ross, 63 Ala. 'But no disability shall extend the period beyond twenty years. Oxford v. Estes, supra; Greenlees ......
-
Fletcher v. First Nat. Bank of Opelika
...of review to impeach a decree for fraud. Gordon's Adm'r v. Ross, 63 Ala. 363; Nichols v. Dill, 222 Ala. 455, 132 So. 900; Manegold v. Beavan, 189 Ala. 241, 66 So. 448; Wilkerson v. Wilkerson, 230 Ala. 567, 161 So. And whether we regard section 6608, or section 8943, Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 20,......
-
Sims v. Riggins
... ... Wilson, 75 Ala. 58; Gordon v. Ross, 63 Ala ... 363; Willis v. Rice, 157 Ala. 258, 48 So. 397, 131 ... Am.St.Rep. 55; Manegold v. Beavan, 189 Ala. 248, 66 ... In the ... instant case, complainants were interested in the said ... partition proceeding in the city ... ...