Maney v. City
Decision Date | 12 May 1931 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 19224 |
Citation | 150 Okla. 77,1931 OK 250,300 P. 642 |
Parties | MANEY et al. v. OKLAHOMA CITY. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 1. Municipal Corporations--Two Classes of Powers of Cities.
A city has two classes of powers--the one legislative, public, governmental, in the exercise of which it is a sovereignty and governs its people; the other proprietary, quasi private, conferred upon it, not for the purpose of governing its people, but for the private advantage of the inhabitants of the city and of the city itself as a legal personality.
2. Same--Operation of Water Plant Held Business Function.
Municipal corporations in operating a water plant exercise business and administrative functions, rather than those strictly governmental in their nature, and in the exercise of such functions are governed largely by the, same rules applicable to Individuals or private corporations engaged in the same business.
3. Same--Contractor Excavating for Water Works Plant Held Entitled to Extra Pay for Removal of Unexpected Quantity of Rock Where Representations of City Engineer Relied on.
Where a contractor, contracting with the municipality in the construction of a water works plant, contracts to excavate a by-pass and encounters a large quantity of rock, which was unexpected by the contractor and the city, the extra expense over what would have been necessary had the character of the materials to be excavated been such as was represented by the defendant city and its engineer and as represented by its plans, specifications, maps, profiles and boring or sounding sheet, should be allowed to the contractors for the construction of water works system for the defendant city; the time not being sufficient for the contractors to make their own borings and they relied upon the defendant city's plans, specifications, profiles, borings showing character of materials and representations made by engineer, although such specifications further provided "The contractor bases his bid upon his own estimates and judgment in regard to both quantity and character of materials."
Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Lucius Babcock, Judge.
Action by Maney Brothers & Company, a copartnership, against Oklahoma City. Judgment for the defendant, and plaintiffs appeal. Reversed, with directions.
E. L. Fulton and Twyford & Smith, for plaintiffs in error.
M. W. McKenzie, A. L. Hull, and Bliss Kelly., for defendant in error.
¶1 This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by plaintiffs in error against defendants in error to recover a money judgment. The controversy grew out of a contract entered into between plaintiffs and defendant wherein plaintiffs were to excavate a bypass for the defendant city. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
¶2 Plaintiffs in their petition alleged:
¶3 The cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. Motion for new trial was filed and overruled. Plaintiffs brought the cause here for review.
¶4 The first proposition presented by the plaintiffs is as follows:
¶5 At the close of the trial the plaintiffs requested the following instruction:
--which was refused by the court and exceptions allowed.
¶6 The undisputed facts in the case show:
That the defendant in error, in contemplation of construction of its improvements to its water supply system, had maps, plans, profiles, and specifications prepared by its engineers, as well as soundings made to ascertain the character of material that was supposed to be in the by-pass, and that said soundings showed very small amount of rock not exceeding 407 cubic yards, which would be a negligible quantity of rock, taking into consideration the entire project. The soundings were transferred onto a blue print and kept in the commissioner's and engineer's office. The prospective bidders secured copies of the plans and specifications, drawings and profiles from the city clerk's office, and also saw and used a sounding sheet and profile showing soundings which were in the city engineer's office and showed the character of the material to be encountered in the by-pass; that said sounding sheet showed only negligible or very small quantity of rock. Plaintiffs used the plans, drawings, specifications, profiles prepared by the defendant city, together with the sounding sheet, and the information furnished by the city engineer in the preparation and submission of their bid. Plaintiffs were shown the sounding sheet by the said city engineer and were advised by the city engineer there was a very negligible quantity of rock. That the bid and contract were made and entered into for the excavation of earth and dirt and not solid rock, except the very small quantity as shown on the sounding sheet. The term "earth" and expression "earth excavation," as used in such contracts, mean earth only, and that there was no rock or anything else except earth. The bidders did not have sufficient length of time to make their independent soundings, and had to rely on the maps, drawings, profiles, and sounding sheet and the information furnished by the city engineer as to the character of the material to be encountered. That plaintiffs were the successful bidders and entered into the contract for the construction of section "B" of the project, being the "by-pass," at the price of 16c per cubic yard, subject to the provisions in the contract and specifications. That plaintiffs fully performed the contract, and that the work was completed and accepted by the defendant city and plaintiffs received compensation therefor at the contract price of 16c per cubic yard for earth excavation, but did not receive compensation for the extra work of rock excavation.
¶7 It was stipulated at the trial below that the plaintiffs excavated 60,000 cubic yards of rock from said by-pass. That after the work had progressed for sometime a change was made in the line of the by-pass from that originally staked out. That in the progress of the work plaintiffs encountered large quantities of rock; that they notified the city engineer and also the city commissioners at a session of the commissioners; that the commissioners, in a body, went out to the by-pass and viewed the rock. That the matter was taken under advisement. Plaintiffs were instructed to proceed with the work and hurry same to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Webb-Boone Paving Co. v. State Highway Com'n
... ... v. State, 135 N.E. 236; ... McGovern v. New York, 139 N.E. 266, reargument ... denied 142 N.E. 262; Manly v. Oklahoma City, 150 ... Okla. 77, 300 P. 642. (3) The words of a contract will be ... given a reasonable construction and the court will likewise ... endeavor ... ...
-
Webb-Boone Paving Co. v. State Highway Comm.
... ... 609; Foundation Co. v. State, 135 N.E. 236; McGovern v. New York, 139 N.E. 266, reargument denied 142 N.E. 262; Manly v. Oklahoma City, 150 Okla. 77, 300 Pac. 642. (3) The words of a contract will be given a reasonable construction and the court will likewise endeavor to give a ... ...
-
State ex rel. Woods v. Cole
... ... In an action by a taxpayer to recover double penalty from city officers and an individual employee of the city under contract, where such action is based upon the alleged illegality of the contract on account of ... 262, 168 P. 800; and in City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 118 Okla. 201, 248 P. 336. That distinction is also recognized in Maney v. Oklahoma City, 150 Okla. 77, 300 P. 642, and in Oklahoma City v. Baldwin, 133 Okla. 289, 272 P. 453. 14 We know, of course, that Oklahoma City has ... ...
-
City of Lawton v. Sherman Mach. & Iron Works
... ... * * *" 29 The trial court concluded, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff was entitled to the allowance of this item under authority of Oklahoma City v. Derr, 109 Okla. 192. 235 P. 218. The plaintiff here offers that decision, as well as Maney v. Oklahoma City. 150 Okla. 77. 300 P. 642. as supporting the conclusion of the trial court in that regard. 30 While it is true that this court, as well as courts generally, appear to have adopted the theory of construing contracts of this nature liberally, to the end that the same may be flexible ... ...