Mang v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Decision Date23 February 1967
Docket NumberNo. 14551,14551
Citation412 S.W.2d 672
PartiesBetsy Ann Meuth MANG et al., Appellants, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees. . San Antonio
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Robert L. Strickland, Carl Raymond Crites, Thomas H. Peterson, San Antonio, for appellants.

Grady Barrett, San Antonio, for appellees.

CADENA, Justice.

Betsy Ann Meuth Mang, individually and as guardian of her minor children, filed this suit to recover from defendant, The Travelers Insurance Company, $15,000.00, the face amount of a life insurance policy issued by Travelers on the life of Alvis Ray Meuth who, at the time of his death, was the husband of Betsy Meuth Mang, the beneficiary under the policy. Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant insurance company.

Alvis Ray Meuth was killed in an airplane crash on March 10, 1963. It is undisputed that at the time of his death he was traveling as a passenger in an airplane piloted by William E. Fricke, who held a student pilot certificate.

The policy in question excluded from its coverage injuries occurring in consequence of travel or flight in any aircraft except, insofar as here pertinent, while the insured was traveling 'as a passenger in a powered civil aircraft of United States or Canadian registry having a valid and current airworthiness certificate issued by the duly constituted authority of the United States or Canada having jurisdiction over civil aviation, and operated by a duly licensed or certificated pilot, while such aircraft is being used for transportation only and not for any purpose such as testing, experimenting, or any other purpose except the sole purpose of transportation.'

The airplane in question was a powered civil aircraft having a valid and current airworthiness certificate issued by the appropriate agency of the United States. Therefore, the only question which we need decide is whether the airplane in question which was being operated by a student pilot, was, at the time of the fatal accident, being 'operated by a duly licensed or certificated pilot.'

The certification of pilots in this country is governed by Part 61 of the Federal Aviation Regulations promulgated by the Federal Aviation Agency. Sec. 61.1 recites that Part 61 prescribes the requirements for the issuance of 'the following certificates and ratings, and the conditions under which those certificates and ratings are necessary, and the general operating rules for the holders of those certificates and ratings: (a) Student, private, and commercial pilot (airplane, rotorcraft, glider, and lighter-than-air aircraft) certificates. (b) Airline transport pilot certificates. (c) Special purpose pilot certificates. (d) Flight instructor certificates. (e) Aircraft and instrument ratings. (f) Free balloon pilot certificates.'

The requirements for obtaining a certificate, the privileges conferred by the issuance of a certificate, and the limitations imposed on the holder of a certificate vary according to the type of certificate involved. (Secs. 61.61--61.183). Sec. 61.73(a)(1) expressly prohibits the holder of a student pilot certificate from acting as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying a passenger. The student pilot certificate which was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Westport v. Atchley, Fussell, Waldrop & Hlavinka
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • April 10, 2003
    ...for adopting the insured's interpretation only apply where the contract language is ambiguous. Mang v. Travelers Ins. Co., 412 S.W.2d 672, 674 (Tex.Civ.App.1967, writ ref'd). A contract is only ambiguous if it is susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations. See Glover v. Nat'l Ins......
  • America's Recommended Mailers v. Maryland Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • September 24, 2008
    ...adopting the insured's interpretation only apply where the contract language is ambiguous." Id., citing Mang v. Travelers Ins. Co., 412 S.W.2d 672, 674 (Tex.Civ.App.1967, writ ref'd). Notably, "if the allegations in the underlying pleadings could even potentially trigger coverage, and the a......
  • Glover v. National Ins. Underwriters
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • January 12, 1977
    ...parties involved fact situations and exclusionary clauses different from those here in issue. See, e.g., Mang v. Travelers Insurance Co., 412 S.W.2d 672 (Tex.Civ.App.1967, writ ref'd); Ranger Insurance Co. v. Rogers, 530 S.W.2d 162 (Tex.Civ.App.1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Insurance Co. of Nor......
  • National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Hudson Energy Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 19, 1989
    ...incurred while the aircraft is operated by other than the pilot or pilots specified in the policy. Mang v. Travelers Insurance Co., 412 S.W.2d 672 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1967, writ ref'd).3 The term in flight was defined for the jury to mean "the time commencing with the actual takeoff r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT