Mangino v. McKenney

Decision Date19 March 2018
Docket NumberNo. 17–1147.,17–1147.
Citation200 L.Ed.2d 475,138 S.Ct. 1311 (Mem)
Parties Nicholas MANGINO, petitioner, v. Vicki McKENNEY, Individually and as Next Friend of Stephen McKenney, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephen McKenney.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Gray v. Cummings
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • February 22, 2019
    ...800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982) ; McKenney v. Mangino, 873 F.3d 75, 80 (1st Cir. 2017), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1311, 200 L.Ed.2d 475 (2018). This protection attaches "to all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law." Malley v. Briggs......
  • Caraballo v. Hosp. Pavia Hato Rey, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • February 28, 2019
    ...entitlement to judgment as a matter of law." McKenney v. Mangino , 873 F.3d 75, 80 (1st Cir.2017), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1311, 200 L.Ed.2d 475 (2018). When a plaintiff opposes summary judgment, she [plaintiff] bears "the burden of producing specific facts sufficient to def......
  • Lawless v. Steward Health Care Sys., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • June 25, 2018
    ...entitlement to judgment as a matter of law." McKenney v. Mangino, 873 F.3d 75, 80 (1st Cir. 2017), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1311, 200 L.Ed.2d 475 (2018) ; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Where, as here, the parties cross-move for summary judgment, the court must assay each motion "......
  • Mackey v. Town of Tewksbury, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-12173-MBB
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • January 7, 2020
    ...Mangino, 873 F.3d 75, 81 (1st Cir. 2017) (quoting Alfano v. Lynch, 847 F.3d 71, 75 (1st Cir. 2017) ), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 1311, 200 L.Ed.2d 475 (2018). "Second, the court must determine ‘whether the right at issue was "clearly established" at the time of defendant's all......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT