Manheim v. Manheim

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationManheim v. Manheim, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 34 A.D.2d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Decision Date13 April 1970
PartiesPaul E. MANHEIM, Respondent, v. Ruth G. MANHEIM, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Pollack, Greenspoon & Singer, New York City, for plaintiff-respondent; Daniel A. Pollack, New York City, of counsel.

Baar, Bennett & Fullen, New York City, for defendant-appellant; Robert E. Smith, New York City, of counsel.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 19, 1969, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. 60 Misc.2d 88, 302 N.Y.S.2d 473.

CHRIST, Acting P.J., and RABIN, MUNDER, MARTUSCELLO and BENJAMIN, JJ., concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Susan W. v. Martin W.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1977
    ...This latter principle was rejected by the trial court in Manheim v. Manheim, 60 Misc.2d 88, 94, 302 N.Y.S.2d 473, 479, affd. 34 A.D.2d 735, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1017, wherein the court instead concluded 'There is no rule of law that common possession of marital personalty results in joint ownership......
  • Donlin v. Hemingway Transport, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 13, 1970
  • Kroul v. Kroul
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 11, 1973
    ...Their bare common possession did not result in a joint ownership (see Manheim v. Manheim, 60 Misc.2d 88, 302 N.Y.S.2d 473, affd. 34 A.D.2d 735, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1017). ...