Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Company
| Citation | 353 U.S. 927,1 L.Ed.2d 722,77 S.Ct. 706 |
| Decision Date | 08 April 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 702,702 |
| Parties | Keith L. MANION et al., Petitioners, v. KANSAS CITY TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Ralph M. Jones, Kansas City, Mo., Charles B. Blackmar, Russell B. Day and Harold C. Heiss, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioners.
Mr. Horace F. Blackwell, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for respondent.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Kansas City Court of Appeals of Missouri must be vacated in the light of our decision in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River and Indiana R. Co., 353 U.S. 30, 77 S.Ct. 635, because the dispute here is not pending before the National Railroad Adjustment Board. The cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision and without prejudice to the power of the Court of Appeals to reinstate its judgment if the dispute is submitted to the Adjustment Board by either party within a reasonable time.
Judgment vacated and cause remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Prof'l Airline Flight Control Ass'n v. Spirit Airlines Inc.
...As a result, we have no power to grant the injunctive relief PAFCA seeks. See, e.g. , Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co. , 353 U.S. 927, 927, 77 S.Ct. 706, 1 L.Ed.2d 722 (1957) (vacating an injunction in a minor dispute "because the dispute [was] not pending before the ... Adjustment Bo......
-
INTERNATIONAL ASS'N OF M. & AW v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.
...R. R., 7 Cir., 1961, 290 F.2d 881, cert. denied 368 U.S. 900, 82 S.Ct. 174, 7 L.Ed.2d 96; cf. Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry., 1957, 353 U.S. 927, 77 S.Ct. 706, 1 L.Ed.2d 722. See also 29 U.S.C. § Alternatively, the Union contends that section 2 First of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. ......
-
Ashley, Drew & Northern Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union and Its Affiliated Local No. 1121, 1121
...meaning).22 A further difficulty is that AD&N did not attempt to invoke RLA procedures, see Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry., 353 U.S. 927, 927, 77 S.Ct. 706, 1 L.Ed.2d 722 (1957), although UTU's unilateral action may have excused AD&N of this usual requirement, see Chicago & Ill. Midland......
-
Rutland Railway Corp. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng.
...injunction in a minor dispute before the matter is submitted to the Railroad Adjustment Board. Cf. Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry., 353 U.S. 927, 77 S.Ct. 706, 1 L.Ed.2d 722 (1957); Hilbert v. Pennsylvania R.R., 290 F.2d 881 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 900, 82 S.Ct. 174, 7 L.Ed.2d 9......