Manjiyani v. Ashcroft, 01-70415.

Decision Date09 September 2003
Docket NumberNo. 01-70415.,01-70415.
Citation343 F.3d 1018
PartiesYasmeen MANJIYANI, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Timothy M. Greene, Greene & Lloyd, PLLC, Puyallup, WA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Donald E. Keener, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Michelle E. Gorden, Attorney, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On Petition to Review an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before BETTY B. FLETCHER and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MARY H. MURGUIA, District Judge.*

ORDER VACATING OPINION AND GRANTING REHEARING
ORDER

This matter is before the court on petitioner Yasmeen Manjiyani's petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed June 11, 2003. We grant the petition for rehearing and vacate our opinion: Manjiyani v. INS, 324 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir.2003). Manjiyani's petitions for rehearing arise from this court's denial of her petition to compel the BIA to reopen her deportation proceedings on the grounds that the INS failed to provide adequate notice. See id. Manjiyani contends that we erred in determining that she did not notify the INS in Los Angeles that she was in deportation proceedings in the forms that she filed with that office in her petition to adjust status and in which she informed the INS of her Upland, California, address. In her petition for rehearing, she argues that the INS was actually aware of her California address and failed to afford her due process when it sent notice of her deportation proceedings to her former addresses in Washington state. In support of her claim, she submitted her complete application to adjust status that included her Upland address and informed the INS office in Los Angeles that she was in deportation proceedings in Seattle.

Manjiyani requested, pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 10(e), that we supplement the record on appeal to consider the complete application to adjust status as a basis for granting her petition to reopen. Under former § 106(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4), which governs this case, a petition for review of a final agency order is a record review. Partial copies of the application to adjust status were included in the record before the BIA and the complete application was in the files of the INS.1 We granted Manjiyani's request to supplement in order to determine whether we should grant her ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Hamazaspyan v. Holder
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • December 21, 2009
    ...evidence." Manjiyani v. INS, 324 F.3d 1138, 1141 (9th Cir.2003) (citations omitted), vacated on other grounds, Manjiyani v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 1018(9th Cir.2003). III. Statutes and The notice requirements for immigration proceedings are set forth in 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229, 1229a. Section 1229 cov......
  • Rendon v. Holder
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • October 20, 2010
    ...Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) office was actually aware of his application to adjust status. Cf. Manjiyani v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 1018, 1020 (9th Cir. 2003). ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT