Mann v. Hyams

Decision Date27 July 1893
Citation13 So. 681,101 Ala. 431
PartiesMANN ET AL. v. HYAMS, ET AL.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from city court of Montgomery; Thomas M. Arrington, Judge.

Bill by J. & H. Mann & Co. and others against Samuel Hyams and others to have a certain sale set aside as illegal, fraudulent, and void. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Appeal dismissed.

Richardson & Reese, for appellants.

Tompkins & Troy, Arrington & Graham, and A. A. Wiley, for appellees.

HARALSON, J.

The statute (Code, § 3612) authorizes an appeal to be taken from a decree sustaining or overruling a demurrer to a bill in equity. The appeal in this case purports to be taken from a decree of the city court sustaining a demurrer to the bill, and errors are assigned on such an alleged decree. But, on examination, we find no such decree in the record. In the transcript of the docket entries of the chancellor appears the following entry: "April 18, 1893. Submitted for decree on demurrers to the bill, and demurrers sustained." This is no decree, and, without one, an appeal does not lie to this court. The cause must be here dismissed. Bell v. Otts, (Ala.) 13 South. Rep. 43; Wagnon v. Keenan, 77 Ala. 519; Joyner v. State, 78 Ala. 448; Ayers v. State, 71 Ala. 11.

Dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Dawson v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1960
    ...v. Alabama Midland Railway Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. 165; Jasper Mercantile Co. v. O'Rear, 112 Ala. 247, 20 So. 583; Mann v. Hyams, 101 Ala. 431, 13 So. 681. We have held that judicial notice must be taken of the absence of a judgment or decree supporting an appeal, Cooper v. Mann, supra; R......
  • Cooper v. Mann
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • August 20, 1959
    ...v. Alabama Midland Railway Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. 165; Jasper Mercantile Co. v. O'Rear, 112 Ala. 247, 20 So. 583; Mann v. Hyams, 101 Ala. 431, 13 So. 681. We must take judicial notice whether there is a judgment or decree supporting an appeal. Russell v. Russell, There is no alternative ......
  • Mangham v. Mangham, 5 Div. 628
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1955
    ...125 Ala. 512, 28 So. 488; Crawford v. Crawford, 119 Ala. 34, 24 So. 727; Condon v. Enger & Co., 113 Ala. 233, 21 So. 227; Mann v. Hyams, 101 Ala. 431, 13 So. 681. As was said in the case of Park v. Lide, 90 Ala. 246, 7 So. 805, which was also an appeal on demurrer to a bill of 'This record ......
  • Bertrand v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1947
    ... ... [32 So.2d 886.] ... Such an entry is not a decree in equity as it would not be a ... judgment at law, which will support an appeal. Mann v. Hyams, ... 101 Ala. 431, 13 So. 681. Many cases are cited in 2 Ala.Dig., ... Appeal and Error, k123: later cases are Wilbanks v. Mitchell, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT