Manns v. Com.
| Decision Date | 25 February 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 0231-91-3,0231-91-3 |
| Citation | Manns v. Com., 414 S.E.2d 613, 13 Va.App. 677 (Va. App. 1992) |
| Parties | Robert Marcellus MANNS, Jr. v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record |
| Court | Virginia Court of Appeals |
M. Dean Cranwell, Vinton, for appellant.
H. Elizabeth Shaffer, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen., John H McLees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellee.
Present: KOONTZ, C.J., and COLEMAN and ELDER, JJ.
Robert Marcellus Manns, Jr. appeals from his conviction at a bench trial of the misdemeanor of interfering with the property rights of another in violation of Code § 18.2-137. On appeal, defendant asserts that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the conviction. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On July 5, 1990, John Rider drove Kaliah Al'Hindi to the restaurant where she worked. As Al'Hindi was getting out of the car, defendant appeared, grabbed her by the arm, and tried to pull her from the car. Al'Hindi managed to get back into the car, and Rider drove away. About thirty minutes later, Rider and Al'Hindi again encountered defendant, who by this time was in a car and accompanied by a friend, Joe Baytops. With Baytops driving, the two men pursued Rider and Al'Hindi at speeds up to eighty-five miles per hour. At one point, when the two cars had been slowed by traffic and travelled side by side, defendant leaned out the passenger window of Baytops' car and threw a glass bottle at Rider's car, striking it on the driver's window, which was closed at the time. The bottle shattered but did no damage to Rider's car.
After trying to run Rider's car off the road, Baytops and defendant pulled in front of Rider and slammed on the brakes, causing Rider to hit them from behind at a speed of approximately forty-five to fifty miles per hour. The collision did $700 in damage to Rider's car, though no one was injured. Frightened, Rider drove around Baytops' car and, with Baytops and defendant again in pursuit, sought and flagged down a state trooper.
Both defendant and Baytops testified for the defense. Baytops testified that he and defendant had seen Al'Hindi, a passenger in Rider's car, flash her middle finger at them, make faces, laugh, and wave a ring that belonged to defendant. Baytops stated that none of this behavior angered him. He also stated that, although he had followed behind Rider's car, he had not chased Rider. Instead, he had been driving fifty-five miles per hour, the speed limit, on his way to his grandmother's house. At one point after he had had occasion to pass Rider's car, Baytops testified, Rider accelerated and rammed him from behind. Baytops noted that it was only after the collision that defendant had tossed not a glass bottle, but a plastic bottle, at Rider's car.
Defendant testified that, several days prior to the collision, Al'Hindi had taken his class ring without permission. He said that he asked Baytops to follow Rider's car in order to recover his ring. Defendant indicated that he had intended to follow Rider until he stopped. He also stated that he and Baytops were not chasing Rider's car, but that Baytops was driving to defendant's grandmother's house. After passing Rider, defendant said, Baytops slowed down for mechanical reasons and Rider hit them from behind, then passed them. It was then that defendant threw the bottle.
Defendant asserts that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a conviction of interfering with the property rights of another.
Defendant was originally charged, tried, and convicted by the trial judge of maliciously throwing a missile at a moving vehicle,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Quillian
...at the hearing, Volkswagen cannot now be heard to complain of such alleged defects in that proceeding. See Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 677, 680, 414 S.E.2d 613, 615 (1992) (holding that a party may not take advantage of an error it VIII. CONCLUSION For these reasons, we affirm the cir......
-
Debroux v. Com.
...the Commonwealth is barred from asserting the exception as a basis for affirmance on appeal. See, e.g., Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 677, 679-80, 414 S.E.2d 613, 615 (1992) (holding that a party, "having agreed upon the action taken by the trial court, should not be allowed to assume a......
-
Timbers v. Com.
...here. See, e.g., Johnson v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 674, 683, 496 S.E.2d 143, 147 (1998) (citing Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 677, 679-80, 414 S.E.2d 613, 615 (1992)). Initially, we must determine whether appellant was subjected to interrogation, i.e., "express questioning or its func......
-
Johnson v. Com.
...the Commonwealth is barred from asserting the exception as a basis for affirmance on appeal. See, e.g., Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 677, 679-80, 414 S.E.2d 613, 615 (1992) (holding that a party, "having agreed upon the action taken by the trial court, should not be allowed to assume a......
-
3.3 Criminal Defense
...11 Va. App. 1, 396 S.E.2d 680 (1990).[606] See Purvy v. Commonwealth, 59 Va. App. 260, 717 S.E.2d 847 (2011); Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 677, 414 S.E.2d 613 (1992). In Powell v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 512, 552 S.E.2d 344 (2001), the Virginia Supreme Court held that an indictment cann......
-
9.5 The Charge Upon Which the Accused Is Tried
...offense of murder). See Appendix 9-11 for a sample motion to dismiss—not a lesser offense included.[238] See Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 677, 414 S.E.2d 613 (1992).[239] Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 (1962); Johnson v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 291, 163 S.E.2d 570 (1968); Taylor......
-
3.3 Criminal Defense
...11 Va. App. 1, 396 S.E.2d 680 (1990).[1238] See Purvy v. Commonwealth, 59 Va. App. 260, 717 S.E.2d 847 (2011); Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 677, 414 S.E.2d 613 (1992). In Powell v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 512, 552 S.E.2d 344 (2001), the Virginia Supreme Court held that an indictment can......
-
Table Of Authorities
........................................................................................................... 29, 146 Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 677, 414 S.E.2d 613 Marker v. Union Fid. Life Ins. Co., 125 F.R.D. 121 (M.D.N.C. 1989)...................81 Marrs v. Northam, Record No. 200573......