Mapson v. Montgomery White Trucks, Inc.
| Decision Date | 21 April 1978 |
| Citation | 357 So.2d 971 |
| Parties | 24 UCC Rep.Serv. 302 James A. MAPSON v. MONTGOMERY WHITE TRUCKS, INC. SC 2820. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Lanny S. Vines and Lloyd W. Gathings of Emond & Vines, Birmingham, for appellant.
Thomas R. Elliott, Jr. of London, Yancey, Clark & Allen, Birmingham, for appellee.
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Mapson's employer on the basis of the employer's immunity under Alabama's Workmen's Compensation Act. We affirm.
Under the stipulated facts, Montgomery White Trucks, Inc. sold a truck to J. R. Rutledge. Several months later, the truck was returned for repairs under warranty. Mapson, as an employee of Montgomery White, and "pursuant to his employment with said employer" was repairing the truck when it rolled over him, resulting in serious permanent injuries. Mapson collected workmen's compensation benefits.
Mapson brought suit against White Truck Manufacturing, Ltd., White Motor Corp., Montgomery White Trucks, Inc., and J. R. Rutledge, et al. The employer, Montgomery White, was granted summary judgment, and the trial court entered final judgment under ARCP 54(b) as to that defendant.
Mapson, alleging that the accident resulted from a defective double-reduction switch, attempts recovery under the implied warranty of merchantability. Tit. 7A, §§ 2-314 and 2-318, Code of Ala. 1940 (1966). He strenuously urges adoption of the "dual-capacity doctrine." As explained by Professor Larson,
"Under this doctrine, an employer normally shielded from tort liability by the exclusive remedy principle may become liable in tort to his own employee if he occupies, in addition to his capacity as employer, a second capacity that confers on him obligations independent of those imposed on him as employer." A. Larson, 2A The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 72.80, p. 14-112 (1976).
Mapson contends that in the present situation, Montgomery White wears two hats: (1) that of employer and (2) that of a seller of goods to the public. It is in Montgomery White's capacity as a seller, thus subjecting it to the implied warranty of merchantability, that it is being sued.
This factual situation, however, does not afford us an opportunity to consider the merits of the "dual-capacity doctrine." Montgomery White did not undertake any special independent relationship toward Mapson other than that of employer-employee. Rather, it is from the very nature of Mapson's employment, which of necessity includes working on defective and damaged trucks, that the accident resulted. Cf. Kelly, "Workmen's Compensation and Employer Suability: The Dual-Capacity Doctrine," 5 St....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.
...(1979) 119 N.H. 89, 397 A.2d 1048; Kottis v. United States Steel Corp. (7th Cir. 1976) 543 F.2d 22, 24-26; Mapson v. Montgomery White Trucks, Inc. (Ala.1978) 357 So.2d 971, 972-973; Needham v. Fred's Frozen Foods, Inc. (1977) 171 Ind.App. 671, 359 N.E.2d 544, 545; Rosales v. Verson Allsteel......
-
Henning v. General Motors Assembly Div.
...N.E.2d 1069 (1977); Longever v. Revere Copper and Brass, Inc., 381 Mass. 221, 408 N.E.2d 857 (1980). See also Mapson v. Montgomery White Trucks, Inc., 357 So.2d 971, 972 (Ala.1978) (court rejected the employee's contention that worker's compensation exclusivity did not apply since the emplo......
-
Hills v. Salt River Project Ass'n
...787, 354 N.E.2d 553 (1976); Needham v. Fred's Frozen Foods, Inc., 171 Ind.App. 671, 359 N.E.2d 544 (1977); Mapson v. Montgomery White Trucks, Inc., 357 So.2d 971 (Ala.1978); Gothreaux v. Gulf Oxygen Company, Inc., 289 So.2d 235 (La.App.1974); State v. Purdy, 601 P.2d 258 (Alaska 1979).2 The......
-
Billy v. Consolidated Mach. Tool Corp.
...797; Mercer v. Uniroyal, Inc., 49 Ohio App.2d 279, 361 N.E.2d 492), most have specifically refused to do so (Mapson v. Montgomery White Trucks, 357 So.2d 971 (Ala.); Profilet v. Falconite, 56 Ill.App.3d 168, 14 Ill.Dec. 16, 371 N.E.2d 1069; Winkler v. Hyster Co., 54 Ill.App.3d 282, 12 Ill.D......