Maran v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, Civ. No. 17-308 (KM) (MAH)

CourtUnited States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
Writing for the CourtHon. Kevin McNulty, United States District Judge
Citation417 F.Supp.3d 510
Docket NumberCiv. No. 17-308 (KM) (MAH)
Decision Date22 October 2019
Parties Erik MARAN, Plaintiff, v. VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, LLC; Scratch Events, LLC ; Robert Silva; DJ Silva, LLC; John Doe Entities 1–20; John Does 11–20, Defendants.

417 F.Supp.3d 510

Erik MARAN, Plaintiff,
v.
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, LLC; Scratch Events, LLC ; Robert Silva; DJ Silva, LLC; John Doe Entities 1–20; John Does 11–20, Defendants.

Civ. No. 17-308 (KM) (MAH)

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

Signed October 22, 2019


417 F.Supp.3d 516

Merrill Michael O'Brien, O'Brien Thornton LLC, Paramus, NJ, for Plaintiff.

Jonathan Scott Robinson, Law Office Terkowitz & Hermesmann, Somerset, NJ, Allyson Beth Belmont, Lester, Schwab, Katz & Dwyer, LLP, Teaneck, NJ, Jeffrey S. Bell, Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola, Lundell, Levitt & Boylan, PC, Bridgewater, NJ, for Defendants.

Hon. Kevin McNulty, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Erik Maran alleges that he was exposed to a loud noise from a disc jockey's (DJ's) loudspeaker at a Victoria's Secret sales event, and suffered hearing loss as a result. Maran brought this negligence action against several entities that were in various ways associated with the mishap. Now before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by two pairs of defendants:

(a) Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC ("Victoria's Secret") and Scratch Events, LLC ("Scratch") (DE 86); and

417 F.Supp.3d 517

(b) Robert Silva and DJ Silva, LLC (together referred to as "Silva" unless otherwise specified) (DE 87).

For the reasons that follow, the motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The net result is that Scratch is dismissed from the case entirely. The only remaining counts against Victoria's Secret are Count I (Negligence) and Count II (Premises Liability). The only remaining count against Silva in his personal capacity and DJ Silva, LLC is Count I (Negligence).

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Incident

On the evening of December 7, 2014, Maran and his girlfriend, Regina Swartz, went to the Victoria's Secret store at the Short Hills Mall. (DE 87-5). Maran and Swartz were there to attend the Fashion Show Shopping Event, to which they had been invited by Victoria's Secret. (DE 87-5). Upon their arrival, the event had not yet formally begun. Maran recalled that there were only a few customers in the store. (DE 87-6 at 97:5–11).

Maran and Swartz entered the store on its right side and walked toward the center sales space. (DE 87-5). In this center space, along the merchandise aisles, there were large loudspeakers mounted on floor stands, so that each speaker box was approximately five to six feet above the floor. (DE 87-5). The speakers were placed immediately adjacent to the aisles. (DE 87-5). Maran later testified that he noticed the placement of the speakers, observing that whoever set them up had wisely left the aisle clear, so that patrons could circulate freely. He added that he noticed the placement of the speaker because, as an architect, he paid attention to details like that. (DE 87-6 at 117:15–118:8).

The event had not yet begun when Maran and Swartz arrived, and there was no sound or music emanating from any speaker. (DE 87-5). As Maran passed through the store, he walked in the aisle between a display table of merchandise and a speaker that was two or three feet away from him. (DE 87-5). As Maran passed, a speaker on his left side, which until that point had been silent, suddenly emitted a blast of sound. (DE 87-5). Maran testified that he immediately felt pain:

I put my hands to my ears immediately, to cover them because they hurt, and moved away as quickly as I could. I noticed an immediate change in my ears, as if a switch had been turned off, I continued to cover my ears until I connected with Regina and we left the store.

The speaker was not attended by anyone, and was silent before the sound blast. There was no advanced warning, test or sound check while we were present, which might have given me time to redirect my path away from the speaker. The volume was immediately turned down or off after the blast. I don't remember what kind of sound or /music it was, as it was brief and I became immediately focused on covering my ears for the rest of the time I was in the store.

(DE 87–5 at 2–3). Maran could not further elaborate on the nature or source of the sound. (DE 87-6 at 120:17–20). The blast lasted for approximately one second, and the speaker again fell silent. (DE 87-6 at 120:21–23). In all, Maran had been at the store for less than five minutes when the sound blast occurred (DE 87-6 at 98:3–5), and he left the store about a minute or two afterward, (DE 87-6 at 110:20–116:6).

Maran later testified that apart from the speaker that caused the offending blast, he does not remember other sound equipment at the store on the day of the incident.

417 F.Supp.3d 518

(DE 87-6 at 114:5–8). He did not then know who operated the speaker or controlled its volume. (DE 87-6 at 132:14–25). Maran has no particular recollection of a DJ, DJ booth, DJ equipment, or other sound equipment at the store. (DE 87-6 at 106:25–107:3; 114:13–15). In fact, it was only later that he and Swartz learned that Victoria's Secret had hired a DJ. (DE 87-6 at 115). Maran testified that he did not see any other customers react to the sound from the speaker or lodge any complaints about the sound. (DE 87-6 at 125:3–13).

B. The Aftermath

Maran alleges that the sound blast injured and impaired the hearing in both of his ears:

1) I have hearing loss in my left ear, which has remained consistent based on all testing in subsequent visits since the event. Based on what Dr. Fieldman and others have told me, my hearing loss is in a particular range, a "notch," which is indicative of loss of hearing due to a blast.

2) I have Tinnitus 24/7 in my left ear.

3) I have high sensitivity in both my right and left ears, also known as Hyperacusis, as labeled in Dr. Fieldman's notes.

(DE 87–5 at 3).

The pain had not abated a month after the incident, and so on January 12, 2015 Maran began seeing Dr. Robert Fieldman, an otolaryngologist.1 (DE 91 ¶ 112). Dr. Fieldman administered several unsuccessful treatments to Maran, including steroid shots and acupressure. (DE 91 ¶ 112). He also conducted hearing studies, a tympanum pressure study, and a head scan. (DE 91 ¶ 112). Dr. Fieldman concluded that Maran had suffered hearing loss in the left ear, and that there was no surgical option for addressing the hearing loss, the hyperacusis, or the tinnitus. (DE 91-2 at 42).

Dr. Fieldman determined that Maran has "a notch" in his hearing that is consistent with loss of hearing due to a blast.2 (DE 91 ¶ 113). He also explained that "[m]ost people have hearing loss [that is] spread out over the range of sound[, but Maran has] it in one particular area and that's consistent with a blast." (DE 91 ¶ 113).

Dr. Fieldman's report concluded:

In my opinion his sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus in his left ear are permanent in nature and were proximately caused by the loud noise that he was exposed to from the speaker at the time of the incident. My diagnosis is traumatic noise induced sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus to his left ear. His prognosis is permanent sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus with continued ringing and hyperacusis.

(DE 91 ¶ 114; DE 91-2 at 42). Audiologist Natan Bauman also evaluated Maran and concluded that there exists a causal link between the incident at the store and Maran's hearing loss:

In consideration of all of the above and presenting medical and audiological evidence, it is my professional opinion, that there are no basis [sic] to dismiss the linkage between the original incident of December 7th, 2014 and the latent onset of tinnitus. Therefore, it is my professional opinion that the latent tinnitus resulted from the original December 7th, 2014 incident.
417 F.Supp.3d 519
It is also my professional opinion that the hyperacusis that Mr. Maran suffers from, in the contralateral ear, is due to the same incident which occurred on December 7th, 2014

(DE 91 ¶ 115; DE 91-2 at 55).

C. Scratch Events and Silva

Victoria's Secret engaged the services of Scratch Events, a promoter for events of this kind. (DE 30 & 44; DE 86 ¶ 17). Indeed, Victoria's Secret had hired Scratch to provide DJs for 350 of its stores, the December 7, 2014 event being a nationwide one. (DE 87 ¶ 16). Scratch asked Silva,3 with whom it had a professional history, to acts as DJ for event at the Short Hills Mall store. (DE 30 & 44; DE 86 ¶ 17). The DJ on duty on December 7, 2014 was in fact Silva. (DE 30 & 44).

At the time of the event, Silva had been a professional DJ for over fifteen years. (DE 86 ¶ 18). In 2011 he had entered into a Talent Services Agreement with Scratch and had worked at prior events under the terms of that agreement. (DE 87-9 & 87-10). Silva testified that that when he performed at the Victoria's Secret store on December 7, 2014, he was doing so pursuant to his Talent Services Agreement with Scratch. (DE 87-8 at 41:9–15).

In all, Silva has performed at three events for Victoria's Secret, the last being the one on December 7, 2014. (DE 87-8 at 145:13–15). He has never received any complaints or reports...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Connors v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Civil Action No. 17-9390(FLW)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • June 3, 2020
    ...the past eight years falling over this particular sign or any other such signs. Id. at ¶ 28; Maran v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, 417 F. Supp. 3d 510, 522 (D.N.J. 2019) ("Generally, a proprietor's duty to his invitee is one of due care under all the circumstances. Ordinarily, an invitee ......
  • Witter v. Sterlingbrook Equine, Inc., Civil Action 19-14799 (MAS) (DEA)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • May 10, 2022
    ...of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.” Maran v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, 417 F.Supp.3d 510, 521 (D.N.J. 2019). A court's task is to “consider all the surrounding circumstances to determine whether it is fair and just to impose upo......
2 cases
  • Connors v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Civil Action No. 17-9390(FLW)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • June 3, 2020
    ...the past eight years falling over this particular sign or any other such signs. Id. at ¶ 28; Maran v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, 417 F. Supp. 3d 510, 522 (D.N.J. 2019) ("Generally, a proprietor's duty to his invitee is one of due care under all the circumstances. Ordinarily, an invitee ......
  • Witter v. Sterlingbrook Equine, Inc., Civil Action 19-14799 (MAS) (DEA)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • May 10, 2022
    ...of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.” Maran v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, 417 F.Supp.3d 510, 521 (D.N.J. 2019). A court's task is to “consider all the surrounding circumstances to determine whether it is fair and just to impose upo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT