March v. Stringer

Citation518 So.2d 65
PartiesGeorge Markham MARCH III v. Ivie Clayton STRINGER. 85-1240.
Decision Date02 October 1987
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

John D. Richardson and Weyman W. McCranie, Jr., of Brown, Hudgens, Richardson, Mobile, for appellant.

Joseph C. McCorquodale III of McCorquodale & McCorquodale, Jackson, for appellee.

ALMON, Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendant, George Markham March III, from the denial of his Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from a default judgment.

On February 2, 1983, an accident involving the parties to this action occurred in the Bel Air Mall at Mobile. According to the plaintiff, Ivie Clayton Stringer, he was struck and severely injured by an automobile being driven by March. According to March, Stringer walked into the side of his automobile.

Thereafter, Stringer employed Joseph C. McCorquodale III, of Jackson, Alabama, to proceed with a claim on his behalf in connection with the accident. Meanwhile, March telephoned his insurance agent within a couple of hours after the accident and reported it.

Stringer's attorney obtained March's address from the accident report and, on February 21, 1983, wrote to him at 1201-B Primeter [sic] Drive, Mobile, Alabama:

"Dear Mr. March:

"This is to advise that we have been retained by Ivie Clayton Stringer to represent him concerning the accident of February 2, 1983, wherein he was struck by your automobile. We would like to resolve this matter without the necessity of having to go to Court.

"Please contact my office in order that we may discuss this matter more fully."

March took this letter to his insurance agent or adjuster (March used both terms at the hearing). Ms. Lequita Robinson, a claims representative for the insurance company, acknowledged to Stringer's attorney on February 28, 1983, that the insurer had received this letter.

Later, the insurer referred the file to Ray McGraw, an independent adjuster, who, on July 25, 1983, wrote to Stringer's attorney that he was handling the file, and concluded:

"We would appreciate your current evaluation along with any information concerning medical treatment and bills incurred by your client. We also look forward to discussing this matter with you since this appears to be most [sic] questionable case of liability on the part of our insured."

On September 6, 1983, Stringer's attorney wrote to McGraw as follows:

"Mr. Ray L. McGraw, Claims Specialist

"McGraw Claims Service, Inc.

"P.O. Box 81472

"Mobile, Alabama 36689

"Re: Our Client: Ivie Clayton Stringer

Your Insured: Yalana March

Date of Loss: February 2, 1983

"Dear Mr. McGraw:

"In connection with the above, enclosed are the following:

"1. Copy of bills from Mobile Infirmary.

"2. Copy of statement from McVay Clinic.

"3. Copy of bill from Bone and Joint Clinic, P.A.

"The total specials in this case amount to approximately $19,827.68. Due to the questionable liability, it is my recommendation that Mr. Stringer accept in settlement of the case the sum of $19,827.68.

"Please let me have your feeling in this regard as soon as possible."

Stringer's attorney wrote again on September 28, 1983:

"Mr. Ray L. McGraw, Claims Specialist

"McGraw Claims Service, Inc.

"P.O. Box 81472

"Mobile, Alabama 36689

"Re: Our Client: Ivie Clayton Stringer

Your Insured: Yalana March

Date of Loss: February 2, 1983

"Dear Mr. McGraw:

"Please reply to my letter of September 6, 1983, in connection with the above case. If we do not hear from you within a week, then we will have no alternative but to proceed with a lawsuit in this matter."

The attorney wrote another letter on October 7, 1983:

"Mr. Ray L. McGraw, Claims Specialist

"McGraw Claims Service, Inc.

"P.O. Box 81472

"Mobile, Alabama 36689

"Re: Our Client: Ivie Clayton Stringer

Your Insured: Yalana March

Date of Loss: February 2, 1983

"Dear Mr. McGraw:

"I have still had no reply to my letter of September 6, 1983, concerning the above matter. Please let me hear from you in this matter within one week."

On December 15, 1983, he sent another letter:

"Mr. Ray L. McGraw, Claims Specialist

"McGraw Claims Service, Inc.

"P.O. Box 81472

"Mobile, Alabama 36689

"Re: Ivie Clayton Stringer

"Dear Mr. McGraw:

"Please respond to our demand for settlement in the above case. Enclosed are copies of prior correspondence."

Stringer's attorney testified that during this correspondence he had no telephone conversations with McGraw. According to McGraw, however, he had telephone conversations with Stringer's attorney, during which he discussed the claim and his company's position, at least until December 27, 1983.

On January 24, 1984, Stringer filed an action for damages in Clarke County against March. The complaint contained two counts, one based on negligence and one on wanton conduct. The summons filed therewith stated that the defendant "may be served at: 1201-B Primiter Drive, Mobile, Alabama 36605." This summons was returned "Not Found," as acknowledged by a deputy sheriff's signature. Then service of process was attempted by certified mail on March 26, 1984, at the same address. This certified mail process was returned on April 20, 1984, "Unclaimed."

On June 19, 1984, Stringer's attorney moved by affidavit in the trial court for service by publication. The pertinent part of that affidavit follows:

"My name is Joseph C. McCorquodale, III, and I am attorney for the plaintiff in the above styled cause. The only address available to the plaintiff for the defendant, George Markham March, III, is that address listed on the accident report which is 1201-B Primiter Drive, Mobile, Alabama 36605. Service of process on the defendant has been attempted at the aforesaid address and in the court file there appears a notation from the process server stating 'returned not found.' Plaintiff does not know any other address for the defendant. Plaintiff can only assume that the defendant is avoiding service and that his present location or residence is unknown except for the aforesaid residence where service has already been attempted. Therefore, plaintiff requests that this court allow service by publication. Since the last known address of the defendant was Mobile County, plaintiff requests that the publication be a newspaper published in Mobile County as well as Clarke County."

On that day, the circuit clerk of Clarke County issued an order that publication be made once a week for four consecutive weeks in The South Alabamian, a newspaper published in Clarke County, and in The Mobile Press Register, a newspaper published in Mobile County, "requiring the said George Markham March, III, to plead or answer to the complaint in this cause by the 19th day of August, 1984, or in default thereof, thirty days thereafter a default judgment may be taken against said defendant." Subsequently, a legal notice, ordered by the circuit clerk of Clarke County, was published on June 28, July 5, July 12 and July 19 in both of the newspapers referred to above.

Apparently there arose thereafter some question concerning the sufficiency of the previous affidavit for service by publication, for on December 5, 1984, Stringer filed a motion for service by publication, from which we quote in pertinent part:

"The plaintiff moves the Court to order service by publication and as grounds therefor shows as follows:

"1. Personal service on defendant, GEORGE MARKHAM MARCH, III, is not practicable because plaintiff has no knowledge as to the residence of said defendant or where he can be found, although the plaintiff has made diligent efforts to learn the whereabouts of said defendant.

"2. A summons was issued in this case directed to said defendant, which was returned March 5, 1984, by the Sheriff, endorsed, 'Not Found.'

"WHEREFORE, plaintiff moves this Court to order service by publication in a newspaper and for a time to be designated by this Court, pursuant to Rule 4.3, Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure."

The attached affidavit stated, in pertinent part:

"Joseph C. McCorquodale, III, being duly sworn, on oath deposes and says:

"1. That he is the attorney for the plaintiff in this cause.

"2. That the residence of the defendant, GEORGE MARKHAM MARCH, III, is unknown.

"3. A summons issued by the Circuit Clerk and delivered to the Sheriff was returned by him on March 5, 1984, endorsed: 'Not Found.'

"4. Affiant has made diligent efforts to ascertain the residence or whereabouts of said defendant and has not been able to discover his residence or whereabouts.

"5. That the defendant is over 19 years of age and that he is not an incompetent person."

We note that the motion and the affidavits do not specify any of the efforts made by Stringer's attorney to locate March.

On December 5, 1984, the Clarke Circuit Court entered the following order:

"On motion of the plaintiff for an order requiring publication in the above-styled cause, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant, GEORGE MARKHAM MARCH, III, cannot be found and his residence is unknown and that personal service on said defendant is not practicable, it is

"ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the defendant, GEORGE MARKHAM MARCH, III, appear or plead to the complaint herein by the 3rd day of February, 1985, and in default thereof that the Court will proceed to the hearing and adjudication of this suit as if he had been served with process.

"It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED THAT THIS ORDER BE PUBLISHED IN The South Alabamian once a week for four consecutive weeks, posted at the door to the Clarke County Courthouse, and sent to the said defendant by registered mail at his last known address."

Publication of this order ensued as directed. Service by certified mail was also attempted on December 6, 1984, at 1201-B Primiter Drive, Mobile, but was returned "not claimed" on January 2, 1985.

On March 18, 1985, Stringer's motion to withdraw his jury demand was granted by the Clarke Circuit Court. On that same date, the circuit court ordered...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • McBrayer v. Hokes Bluff Auto Parts
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • November 1, 1996
    ...judgment can be entered on service by publication." See also Fisher, supra; Wise v. Siegel, 527 So.2d 1281 (Ala.1988); March v. Stringer, 518 So.2d 65 (Ala.1987); Gross v. Loewen, 522 So.2d 306 (Ala.Civ.App.1988); Richardson v. Arrington, 431 So.2d 1301 (Ala.Civ.App.1983); Miles v. McClung,......
  • Boudreaux v. Kemp
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 16, 2010
    ...court file, that were made in an attempt to locate Frank's heirs before seeking to serve them by publication. As noted in March v. Stringer, 518 So.2d 65 (Ala.1987), with regard to the plaintiffs' failure to take even the minimal step of consulting telephone directories, "reasonable diligen......
  • Ex parte American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 16, 1995
    ...with due process. Pollard v. Etowah County Comm'n, 539 So.2d 225 (Ala.1989); Cassioppi v. Damico, 536 So.2d 938 (Ala.1988); March v. Stringer, 518 So.2d 65 (Ala.1987); Smith v. Clark, 468 So.2d 138 (Ala.1985). Rule 60(b)(6) is reserved for extraordinary circumstances, and is available only ......
  • Bracknell v. S.E. Belcher, Inc.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 13, 1987
    ...entry of a default judgment and directing that the judgment be set aside); Johnson v. Moore, 514 So.2d 1343 (Ala.1987); and March v. Stringer, 518 So.2d 65 (Ala.1987) (reversing the trial court's denial of a Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from a default Because the default judgme......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT