De Marco v. Estlow
| Decision Date | 22 September 1952 |
| Docket Number | No. A--383,A--383 |
| Citation | De Marco v. Estlow, 91 A.2d 272, 21 N.J.Super. 356 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1952) |
| Parties | Anthony R. DE MARCO, plaintiff-appellant, v. Francis ESTLOW, defendant-respondent. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
James D. Stockwell, Camden, for appellant (Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, Camden, attorneys).
James M. Davis, Jr., Mt. Holly, for respondent.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J.Super. 30, 86 A.2d 446.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Presten v. Sailer
...60 N.J.Eq. 71, 79, 47 A. 187 (Ch.1900). See DeMarco v. Estlow, 18 N.J.Super. 30, 34-35, 86 A.2d 446 (Ch.1952), aff'd 21 N.J.Super. 356, 91 A.2d 272 (App.Div.1952). These cases, however, are distinguishable from those involving the division of profits from the sale of land which have been he......
-
Lahue v. Pio Costa
...even if costly, are not sufficient, DeMarco v. Estlow, 18 N.J.Super. 30, 34, 86 A.2d 446 (Ch.Div.), aff'd o.b., 21 N.J.Super. 356, 91 A.2d 272 (App.Div.1952). Even if the performance clearly demonstrates the existence of an oral agreement, the statute cannot be avoided if there has not been......
-
Kopp, Inc. v. United Technologies, Inc.
...N.J.Eq. 586, 591-592, 49 A.2d 431 (Ch.Div.1946); DeMarco v. Estlow, 18 N.J.Super. 30, 34, 86 A.2d 446 (Ch.Div.1952), aff'd o.b. 21 N.J.Super. 356 (App.Div.1952). It is fundamental that in order to take the case out of the Statute of Frauds on the basis of part performance, the acts relied u......
-
Schnakenberg v. Gibraltar Sav. & Loan Ass'n
...the complaint for the purposes of the motions. DeMarco v. Estlow, 18 N.J.Super. 30, 86 A.2d 446 (Ch.Div.1952), affirmed 21 N.J.Super. 356, 91 A.2d 272 (App.Div.1954); Orrok v. Parmigiani, 32 N.J.Super. 70, 107 A.2d 815 (App.Div.1954). The court could consider them as motions to dismiss the ......
Get Started for Free