Mariano v. United States, Civ. A. No. 76-502-N.

CourtUnited States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
Writing for the CourtDavid P. L. Berry, John B. Gaidies, Norfolk, Va., for plaintiff
Citation444 F. Supp. 316
PartiesFrederico C. MARIANO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.
Decision Date17 November 1977
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 76-502-N.

444 F. Supp. 316

Frederico C. MARIANO, Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 76-502-N.

United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

November 17, 1977.


David P. L. Berry, John B. Gaidies, Norfolk, Va., for plaintiff.

Michael A. Rhine, Asst. U. S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

KELLAM, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, a Chief Petty Officer on active duty in the United States Navy, seeks to recover compensation from the United States under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 1346(b) and Section 2671 et seq. for injuries sustained while working as a part-time employee of the Navy Enlisted Mess Open, known as the Tradewinds Club, a non-appropriated fund activity situated on the Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia (Tradewinds). He filed his claim with the Commanding Officer of the Naval Base, Norfolk, which was denied by the Department of the Navy on the grounds that the United States had no liability for such injury. This suit followed.

I

On September 28, 1973, plaintiff was working as a part-time employee during his off-duty hours in the Tradewinds Club. At time of the injury, he was attached to a command located on the Naval Station, Norfolk. Part-time employment was permitted by the Chief of Naval Personnel, as provided for in Special Services and Messes

444 F. Supp. 317
Personnel Manual, para. 202 which provides in part that "enlisted personnel, whether or not regularly assigned to the non-appropriated fund activity, may be hired in a civilian capacity and paid from non-appropriated funds." The regulation provides that such work must be performed during off-duty hours, must be voluntary, and must not interfere with the proper performance of such person's military duties. Nor may such a person be hired in such a position which regularly involves more than 32 hours of work per week

At time of the accident and injury on July 13, 1974, plaintiff was in an off duty status from his command, on liberty, but not on leave. He was subject to recall to his command at any time while he was working in the Tradewinds Club. In the performance of his duties at the Tradewinds Club, he was serving as a night manager at the front desk checking identification cards. Some four or more night managers or assistant managers are employed at the Club. While on duty in the Club, he heard a call over the public address system for night managers to proceed to the bar room to provide assistance. As he proceeded, he observed three or four people running in his direction, which was near the main entrance. He heard one of the night managers shout "stop that man." Plaintiff grabbed a man, later identified as Seaman Ray Smith, identified himself and told Smith he was under arrest. He held Smith under control briefly, but a crowd of young black patrons surrounded plaintiff and Smith and commenced assaulting plaintiff, shouting "Don't let our brother be taken away." Smith escaped. Plaintiff pursued one of those who had assaulted him and observed Smith being caught and restrained by one of the night managers. Smith again broke away from the restraint and threw a glass at plaintiff, striking him in the face. As a result of the striking, plaintiff sustained loss of vision in his right eye.

After hospitalization and treatment, plaintiff returned to and continues on active duty as a Petty Officer in the United States Navy. He received and is still receiving full medical treatment and care provided by the Navy.

II

Plaintiff grounds his right of recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act, contending that at time of his injury plaintiff was employed in a "civilian capacity" and that the injury did not arise out of activities incident to his military service. He asserts the injury arose in part-time employment during his off duty hours.

The alleged negligence of the United States is in the assertions that (a) the defendant failed to provide plaintiff with a safe place within which to work, and (b) failed to provide plaintiff with reasonably safe and suitable tools to perform his duties.

The Tradewinds Club is a non-appropriated instrumentality, owned and operated by the United States at the Naval Station, Norfolk. The policies, regulations and procedures for the operation of all enlisted messes ashore, including the Tradewinds Club, are under the technical direction of the Chief of Naval Personnel. Requirements, duties, instructions and guidelines for the operation and administration of such clubs are set forth in the instruction manuals prepared by the Chief of Naval Operations. Such manuals state that the purpose for the establishment and maintenance of such facilities is the well-being, morale and efficiency of enlisted personnel. The operation of such facilities is the direct responsibility of the Commanding Officers to the same extent as any other elements or facilities of their command. Under the direction of the Chief of Naval Personnel, Commanding Officers have the responsibility...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Miller v. U.S., No. 79-1964
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • March 18, 1981
    ...Chambers v. United States, 357 F.2d 224 (8th Cir. 1966); Zoula v. United States, 217 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1954); Mariano v. United States, 444 F.Supp. 316 Page 485 (E.D.Va.1977), aff'd, 605 F.2d 721 (4th Cir. 1979). Theoretically, his off-duty time is not his own. But, this reasoning broadens ......
  • Eckles v. United States, No. 78-71 Civil.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • March 6, 1979
    ...and fell into the water. Court in effect found the depot to be equivalent to a base and barred the claim); Mariano v. United States, 444 F.Supp. 316 (E.D.Va.1977) (soldier injured at off duty job at recreation club owned by I can see no relevant difference between the situation presented he......
  • Frankel v. United States, Civil No. 2:18cv107
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • January 7, 2019
    ...recreational activity benefits the military by boasting morale and health. Hass, 518 F.2d at 1141-42 ; see Mariano v. United States, 444 F.Supp. 316, 320 (E.D. Va. 1977), aff'd, 605 F.2d 721 (4th Cir. 1979) (rejecting the plaintiff's contention that "for an injury to be incident to service ......
3 cases
  • Miller v. U.S., No. 79-1964
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • March 18, 1981
    ...Chambers v. United States, 357 F.2d 224 (8th Cir. 1966); Zoula v. United States, 217 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1954); Mariano v. United States, 444 F.Supp. 316 Page 485 (E.D.Va.1977), aff'd, 605 F.2d 721 (4th Cir. 1979). Theoretically, his off-duty time is not his own. But, this reasoning broadens ......
  • Eckles v. United States, No. 78-71 Civil.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • March 6, 1979
    ...and fell into the water. Court in effect found the depot to be equivalent to a base and barred the claim); Mariano v. United States, 444 F.Supp. 316 (E.D.Va.1977) (soldier injured at off duty job at recreation club owned by I can see no relevant difference between the situation presented he......
  • Frankel v. United States, Civil No. 2:18cv107
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • January 7, 2019
    ...recreational activity benefits the military by boasting morale and health. Hass, 518 F.2d at 1141-42 ; see Mariano v. United States, 444 F.Supp. 316, 320 (E.D. Va. 1977), aff'd, 605 F.2d 721 (4th Cir. 1979) (rejecting the plaintiff's contention that "for an injury to be incident to service ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT