Maricopa Co v. Territory of Arizona

Decision Date04 March 1895
Docket NumberNo. 195,195
Citation156 U.S. 347,39 L.Ed. 447,15 S.Ct. 391
PartiesMARICOPA & P. R. CO. v. TERRITORY OF ARIZONA
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

After the organization of the territory of Arizona, certain land situated within its geographical limits was set apart as an Indian reservation, for the use of the Pima and Maricopa Indians. 11 Stat. 401. The tract is known as the 'Gila River Reservation.' The Maricopa & Phoenix Railroad Company owns and operates within the territory of Arizona 24.16 miles of railroad track, all of which lie within the geographical outlines of the territory, as named in its organic act, but 6.24 miles are within the reservation just mentioned. This portion was constructed under the authority of an act of congress which provided that the railroad should be 'authorized, invested, and empowered with the right to locate, construct, own, equip, operate, use, and maintain a railway and telegraph and telephone line through the Indian reservation situated in the territory of Arizona known as the Gila River Reservation, occupied by the Pima and Maricopa Indians.'

'Sec. 2. A right of way one hundred feet in width through said Indian reservation is hereby granted to the said Maricopa and Phoenix Railway Company, and a strip of land two hundred feet in width, with a length of three thousand feet, in addition to said right of way, is granted for stations for every ten miles of road, no portion of which shall be sold or leased by the company; with the right to use such additional ground, where there are heavy cuts or fills, as may be necessary for the construction and maintenance of the roadbed, not exceeding one hundred feet in width on each side of said right of way, or as much thereof as may be included in said cut or fill; * * * and provided, further, that before any such lands shall be taken for the purposes aforesaid, the consent of the Indians thereto shall be obtained in a manner satisfactory to the president of the United States.'

This act moreover contained a stipulation reserving the right to amend, alter, or repeal its provisions. The tax laws of the territory of Arizona provide as follows:

'The president, vice-president, general superintendent, auditor or general officer of any corporation operating any railway in this territory shall furnish said board, on or before the first Monday in June in each year, a statement signed and sworn to by one of such officers, showing in detail the whole number of miles of railroad in each county, also the whole number of miles owned, operated, or leased in the territory by such corporation making the return, and the value thereof per mile, with a detailed statement of all property of every kind, and the value located in each county in the territory; second, also a detailed statement of the number and value thereof of engines, passenger, mail, express, baggage, freight, and other cars or property owned by such railway, and on railways which are a part of lines extending beyond the limits of this territory. The returns shall show the actual proportion of the amount and full cash value of the rolling stock in use on the corporation's line which is necessary for the transportation of the freight and passengers, and the operation of the railroad in this territory, during the year for which the return is made. The return shall also show the amount and value of property hereinafter designated in this section, and such furtner information shall be furnished as the board may in writing require. If said officers fail to make such statement, said board shall proceed to assess the property of the corporation so failing, and shall add thirty per cent. to the value thereof as ascertained and determined by the said board. The said property shall by valued at its full cash value, and assessments shall be made upon the entire railway within this territory, and shall include the franchise, right of way, roadbed, bridges, culverts, rolling stock, depots, station grounds, buildings, telegraph lines, and all other property, real and personal, exclusively used in the operation of such railway. In assessing said railway and its equipments, said board shall take into consideration all matters connected with said road necessary to enable them to make a just and equitable assessment of said railway property. On or before the third Monday in June in each year said board shall transmit to the board of supervisors of each county, through or into which any railway may run, a statement showing the length of the main track of such railway within the county, and the assessed value per mile of the same as fixed by a pro rata distribution per mile of the assessed value of the whole property herein specified,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Organized Village of Kake v. Egan, 3
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1962
    ...ground was that the railway right-of-way had been withdrawn from the reservation, as was held in Maricopa & Phoenix R. Co. v. Arizona Territory, 156 U.S. 347, 15 S.Ct. 391, 39 L.Ed. 447. 1. The salmon trap is described by the Alaska Supreme Court as follows: 'A trap consists of tall stakes ......
  • John King Mfg Co v. City Council of August, 392
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1928
    ...validity of an authority exercised under the United States had been challenged, was indicated in Maricopa & Phoenix R. R. Co. v. Arizona, 156 U. S. 347, 350, 351, 15 S. Ct. 391, 39 L. Ed. 447, and Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U. S. 45, 49, 50, 18 S. Ct. 521, 42 L. Ed. 943. The subje......
  • In re Skelton Lead & Zinc Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • April 5, 1921
    ...from Thomson v. Union P. R. Co., 76 U.S. 579. In Utah & Northern R. Co. v. Fisher, 116 U.S. 28; Maricopa & Phoenix R. Co v. Ariz. Ter., 156 U.S. 347, 39 L. Ed. 447, 15 S. Ct. 391; Thomas v. Gay, 169 U.S. 264, 42 L. Ed. 740, 18 S. Ct. 340; Wagoner v. Evans, 170 U.S. 588, 42 L. Ed. 1154, 18 S......
  • State ex rel. Peterson v. District Court of Ninth Judicial Dist., 5242
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1980
    ...make their own laws and be ruled by them, ...' " Kake, supra, 369 U.S. at 74-75, 82 S.Ct. at 570. & Phoenix Railroad Co. v. Arizona Territory, 156 U.S. 347, 15 S.Ct. 391, 39 L.Ed. 447 (1895)-a railway right-of-way through a reservation could be taxed since it had been withdrawn from the res......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT