Marinelarena v. Sessions

Decision Date29 March 2018
Docket NumberNo. 14-72003,14-72003
Citation886 F.3d 737 (Mem)
Parties Aracely MARINELARENA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

886 F.3d 737 (Mem)

Aracely MARINELARENA, Petitioner,
v.
Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-72003

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

FILED MARCH 29, 2018


ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Marinelarena v. Barr
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • July 18, 2019
    ...part the petition. Marinelarena v. Sessions , 869 F.3d 780, 792 (9th Cir. 2017). We then granted rehearing en banc. Marinelarena v. Sessions , 886 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2018).3 STANDARD OF REVIEW We review questions of law de novo. Coronado v. Holder , 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014). DISCUS......
  • Pelaez v. U.S. Attorney Gen.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • December 17, 2018
    ...decide the issue en banc soon. See Marinelarena v. Sessions, 869 F.3d 780 (9th Cir. 2017), reh'g en banc granted by Marinelarena v. Sessions, 886 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2018). ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT