Markham v. Raleigh & G. R. Co

Decision Date27 October 1896
CitationMarkham v. Raleigh & G. R. Co, 25 S.E. 786, 119 N.C. 715 (N.C. 1896)
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesMARKHAM. v. RALEIGH & G. R. CO.

Railroad Companies Injuries to Persons on TrackSufficiency of Evidence. in an action against a railroad company for the death of plaintiff's intestate, it appeared that deceased was walking beside defendant's railroad, in a footpath at the end of the cross-ties, and that if he had remained in the path the train would not have struck him. There was evidence that deceased, before he died, said he heard a train coming, and ran to get out of the way, and fell, and his arm was caught by the front wheel. His son, who was with him at the time, testified that deceased could have seen the train, had he looked back. Held, that the evidence did not justify a verdict for plaintiff.

Appeal from superior court, Wake county; Mclver, Judge.

Action by J. C. Markham, administrator of the estate of Perry, deceased, against the Raleigh & Gaston Railroad Company for the death of plaintiff's intestate, caused by defendant's negligence. From a judgment ofcompulsory nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

A son of the intestate testified that he was with him, going towards home from Wake Forest. "We were walking on the path beside the railroad. I passed him, and went over past the crossing. Heard the train blow, and looked back, and saw him down by the side of the road, at the end of the cross-ties, twenty-five or thirty feet from the crossing. The engine blew after it passed me, twenty-five or thirty yards from the crossing. I heard no other blow or signal. I joined my father at Forestville. He was fifty years old, strong and healthy. He was a farmer. I worked with him. He made $400 or $500 per year. He had been drinking, but was not a drunken man. He had a pint of whisky, and four men drank out of it. There was something like a gill left." Cross-examination: "The road crossing was about 150 yards from the depot. I suppose the train was at the depot when we passed along the dirt road. I could have seen it if I had looked. That year my father was not farming. He was hiring himself out." Dr. J. B. Powers, a witness for the defendant: "I was at Wake Forest that day and was called to see intestate, and reached him in ten or thirteen minutes after the injury. He said he was running up the path, stumped his toe, and fell; that the engine did not touch him, but front wheel ran over his arm. He died from the injury. I smelt whisky, but did not see any." Cross-examination: "He was rational. He said he heard the train coming, and ran to get out of the way, and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Davis v. Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • January 12, 1916
    ... ... with a companion, Tom Jennings, on that part of ... defendant's right of way, which lies between the city of ... Raleigh and Pullen's Park, which is about a mile west of ... defendant's station at Raleigh. There are two tracks laid ... on said right of way from ... same principle was declared in Graney v. St. L. I. M. & S. Railway Co., 157 Mo. 666, 57 S.W. 276, 50 L. R. A ... 153. This court in Markham v. Railroad Co., 119 N.C ... 715, 25 S.E. 786, held an engineer, seeing a person walking ... on or near the railroad track, and having no reason ... ...
  • Crenshaw v. Asheville & B. Street Ry. & Transp. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 9, 1907
    ... ... This court has so treated the question in passing upon a ... similar state of facts. Matthews v. Railroad, 117 ... N.C. 640, 23 S.E. 177; Markham v. Railroad, 119 N.C ... 715, 25 S.E. 786; Pharr v. Railroad, 133 N.C. 610, ... 45 S.E. 1021; Meredith v. Railroad, 108 N.C. 616, 13 ... S.E ... ...
  • Crenshaw Et Ux v. Asheville & B. St
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 9, 1907
    ...has so treated the question in passing upon a similar state of facts. Matthews v. Railroad, 117 N. C. 640, 23 S. E. 177; Markham v. Railroad, 119 N. C. 715, 25 S. E. 786; Pharr v. Railroad, 133 N. C. 610, 45 S. E. 1021; Meredith v. Railroad, 108 N. C. 616, 13 S. E. 137; Syme v. Railroad, 11......
  • Free v. Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 17, 1909
    ... ... when he sees the train. Matthews v. Railroad, 117 ... N.C. 640, 23 S.E. 177; Markham v. Railroad, 119 N.C. 715, 25 ... S.E. 786." ...          There ... are decisions rendered by that court to the effect, that a ... ...
  • Get Started for Free