Markle v. Local Union No. 641 of the Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen & Helpers of Am.
Decision Date | 03 February 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 249.,249. |
Citation | 129 N.J.Eq. 32,17 A.2d 783 |
Parties | MARKLE v. LOCAL UNION NO. 641 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, STABLEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA et al. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
The record examined indicates a proper exercise of discretion in ordering inspection of union books.
Appeal from Court of Chancery.
Suit by Joseph Markle, in his own behalf and in behalf of others similarly situate, against Local Union No. 641 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen and Helpers of America, and others, alleging fraudulent mismanagement of the affairs of the defendant union by its officers and seeking appointment of a receiver. From an order for inspection and custody of certain books, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Burke, Sheridan & Hourigan and John H. Sheridan, all of Union City, for appellants.
Isidore Hornstein, of Jersey City, for respondent.
The complainant, alleging himself to be a member of the defendant union and in his own behalf and in behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a bill in the Court of Chancery alleging fraudulent mismanagement of the affairs of the defendant union by its officers and by those pretending that they were such. He sought the appointment of a receiver.
An amended answer denied complainant's membership and joined issue on many of the allegations of the bill which are not necessary for our determination of the present case, which is an appeal from an order directing the proper officers of the union to present to a master in chancery named in the order for inspection and custody the following books of the union:
The petition on which the order for inspection and custody was entered was duly verified. It shows a sufficient basis for the action taken. An order in ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Winne, A--659
...documents controlled by his opponent, rests in the sound discretion of the court in which the cause is pending. Markle v. Local Union, 129 N.J.Eq. 32, 17 A.2d 783 (E. & A. 1940); P. & D. Mfg. Co. v. Barnes, 120 N.J.L. 229, 199 A. 9 (Sup.Ct.1938); State v. Cicenia, supra. The basic philosoph......
-
Markle v. Local Union No. 641 of Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters
...to deliver the books specified to the Master forthwith. There was an appeal from that order to this court. The order was affirmed. 129 N.J.Eq. 32, 17 A.2d 783. Thereafter on April 21, 1941, the respective parties appeared before the Master. Counsel for the complainant said that a Master's s......
- Shaffer v. Shaffer, 217.