Marks v. State
| Decision Date | 04 January 1991 |
| Parties | Marks (Morris Jr.) v. State NO. 438 SEPT. TERM 1990 |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Reported below: 84 Md.App. 269, 578 A.2d 828.
Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
Klauenberg v. State
... ... See Md. Rule 8-131(a); see also In re John H., 293 Md. 295, 303, 443 A.2d 594, 598 (1982) ; Tapscott v. State, 106 Md.App. 109, 124, 664 A.2d 42, 49 (1995), aff'd, 343 Md. 650, 684 A.2d 439 (1996) ; Marks v. State, 84 Md.App. 269, 281, 578 A.2d 828, 834 (1990), cert. denied, 321 Md. 502, 583 A.2d 275 (1991) ... With regard to section 12-106 argument, appellant contends the trial court should have dismissed the indictment against him because he was prejudiced by the amount of ... ...
-
Icgoren v. State
... ... The Court of Appeals recognized this in State v. Brown, 307 Md. 651, 657, 516 A.2d 965 (1986) ("Unlike statutes or rules in many other jurisdictions, [our rules or statutes] were not intended to be codifications of the constitutional speedy trial right ... ") Accord Marks v. State, 84 Md.App. 269, 281, 578 A.2d 828 (1990), cert. denied, 321 Md. 502, 583 A.2d 275 (1991) ... 3 A similar procedural situation existed in Coleman v. State, 49 Md.App. 210, 431 A.2d 696 (1981), but there, the complaint on appeal was directed "solely at the delay in appellant's retrial ... ...
-
Hagez v. State
... ... Page 226 ... likely to have been misled or influenced to the prejudice of the accused ... [by the prosecutor's actions], reversal of the conviction on this [676 A.2d 1008] ground would not be justified.' " Id., (quoting Reidy v. State, 8 Md.App. 169, 172, 259 A.2d 66 (1969)). See also Marks v. State, 84 Md.App. 269, 291, 578 A.2d 828 (1990), cert denied 321 Md. 502, 583 A.2d 275 (1991) ... Three factors must be considered in order to determine whether a prosecutor's remarks are prejudicial to the accused. These are: (1) the closeness of the case; (2) the ... ...
-
Henry v. State
...that the reason for granting it was neutral. See Marks v. State, 84 Md.App. 269, 283, 578 A.2d 828 (1990),cert. denied,321 Md. 502, 583 A.2d 275 (1991) (request for joint continuance is neutral and not chargeable to either party). The request actually was made by defense counsel, however, a......
Request a trial to view additional results