Marren v. Department of Justice, 92-3211
| Decision Date | 26 October 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-3211,92-3211 |
| Parties | NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Robert J. MARREN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
Abou-Hussein v. Mabus
... ... Raymond Edwin MABUS, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Navy, and Naval Criminal Investigative Services Unknown Agents, ... the Court to issue an order to the United States Department of Justice's Office of Information Policy “to publish an update on [its] website” ... Geren, 574 F.Supp.2d 57, 65–67 (D.D.C.2008); Marren v. DOJ, 51 M.S.P.R. 632, 638–40 (1991), aff'd, 980 F.2d 745 ... ...
-
Walia v. Napolitano
... ... Janet NAPOLITANO, as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Defendant. No. 11–cv–2512 (ADS)(WDW). United ... Geren, 574 F.Supp.2d 57, 65–67 (D.D.C.2008); Marren v. DOJ, 51 M.S.P.R. 632, 638–40 (1991), aff'd, 980 F.2d 745 ... U.S. Dep't of Justice, 660 F.Supp.2d 31, 44–46 (D.D.C.2009); see e.g., Viotti v. U.S. Air ... ...
-
Zachariasiewicz v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
... ROBERT F. ZACHARIASIEWICZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, Defendants - Appellees, ANDREA R. BUTLER, ... Congress created an additional statutory appeal ... right to the Board.” Marren v. Dep't of ... Just., 51 M.S.P.R. 632, 638 (M.S.P.B. 1991), aff'd, ... 980 F.2d 745 ... ...
-
Zachariasiewicz v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
...created an additional statutory appeal right to the Board." Marren v. Dep't of Just. , 51 M.S.P.R. 632, 638 (M.S.P.B. 1991), aff'd , 980 F.2d 745 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (Table). I recognize that, in Marren , the Board concluded (wrongly) that it lacked jurisdiction to consider discrimination clai......
Request a trial to view additional results