Marriage of Trubner-Biria, In re

Decision Date07 February 1994
Docket NumberNo. 30653-7-I,TRUBNER-BIRI,R,30653-7-I
Citation72 Wn.App. 858,866 P.2d 675
CourtWashington Court of Appeals
PartiesIn re the MARRIAGE of Karenespondent, and Ali Biria, Appellant.

Michael R. Green, Bellevue, for appellant.

Jill Salmi, Seattle, for respondent.

GROSSE, Judge.

Ali Biria(Ali) appeals a contempt order for his alleged noncompliance with a provision in a decree of dissolution.Specifically, the trial court ordered that Ali not occupy the former family home pending its sale under a property settlement agreement despite the fact that his former wife, Karen Trubner-Biria(Karen), has been paid in full for her interest and has quitclaimed that interest to him.In addition, the trial court set a date by which the house must be sold, and awarded attorney fees to Karen.We reverse, holding that Karen no longer has any interest in the property subject to protection through the judicial process.

The marriage between Karen and Ali was dissolved in 1991.The dissolution decree incorporated a property settlement agreement, signed in December of 1990, dividing the property of the parties.With recognition of the fact that Karen and Ali owed approximately $100,000 to Ali's father, Abdul Biria, the agreement sought to "irreparably divide certain community property and satisfy certain claims" prior to execution of a separation agreement or entry of a decree of dissolution.The agreement was signed by Karen, Ali, Abdul Biria, and respective counsel.The agreement set forth the parties' intent to sell the house as soon as possible, subject to approval of Abdul Biria.After satisfying obligations to Karen in the amount of $25,000, the balance of any sales price was to be paid to Abdul Biria in satisfaction of his $100,000 claim against the community.The parties were not to live in the house pending sale.The house was to be listed and an aggressive effort made to sell it as soon as possible.However, even if the house did not sell right away, payment of the $25,000 was to be made to Karen in two installments on dates certain.Once Karen had been paid, she was to quitclaim her interest to Ali.The agreement specifically set out that the sales price and the terms of any sale were "subject solely to the direction of Abdul Biria".

The house did not sell but Karen was timely paid her $25,000 interest in the house.Ali did not live in the house for 10 months.However, after Karen was paid in full, the house was reconveyed to him giving him clear title.Ali moved back into the home to avoid paying both the mortgage and rental on an apartment.Karen did not approve and brought an action for contempt based on an alleged breach of the agreement.

In the affidavit accompanying her motion, Karen indicated she was initially given temporary possession of the house.However, Ali indicated he could not pay the mortgage, child support, and rent on an apartment, and sought to force a sale.Karen fully acknowledged that Ali's father, Abdul Biria, was in a position to sue to get his money from the house.Because of the interests involved, the parents of the couple negotiated a settlement "pursuant to which [Karen] would leave the house and would be paid $25,000, and Ali and his father would release [Karen] from liability and sell the house."

According to Ali, he could not afford to pay the mortgage on the house, rent on an apartment, and child support.The housing market was depressed and his father did not want the house to sell until he could recoup his investment.The property is subject to a $93,000 mortgage, and the asking price is $229,000, a sum Karen believes to be $20,000 to $30,000 too high.Karen argues the delay is a ruse to allow Ali to stay in the home.She does not want her former husband to take their child to the former "family home."

The trial court erred in ordering Ali to vacate a home...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State v. Hoke
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 1994
  • In re Marriage of Bobbitt
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 2006
    ... ... Pugel v. Pugel, 74 Wash.2d 281, 444 P.2d 783 (1968); Murphy v. Murphy, 44 Wash.2d 737, 270 P.2d 808 (1954); Shay v. Shay, 33 Wash.2d 408, 205 P.2d 901 (1949); In re Marriage of Sedlock, 69 Wash.App. 484, 849 P.2d 1243 (1993); cf. In re Marriage of Trubner-Biria, 72 Wash.App. 858, 861, 866 P.2d 675 (1994) (noting that the court "does not have unfettered discretion to compel the sale of property in a dissolution of marriage."). But in each case the trial court's consideration of the issue occurred during the pendency of the case or at the conclusion of the ... ...
  • In re Marriage of Bobbitt v. Bobbitt, No. 31997-7-II (Wash. App. 9/26/2006)
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 26, 2006
    ... ... Pugel v. Pugel, 74 Wn.2d 281, 444 P.2d 783 (1968); Murphy v. Murphy, 44 Wn.2d 737, 270 P.2d 808 (1954); Shay v. Shay, 33 Wn.2d 408, 205 P.2d 901 (1949); In re Marriage of Sedlock, 69 Wn. App. 484, 849 P.2d 1243 (1993); cf. In re Marriage of Trubner-Biria, 72 Wn. App. 858, 861, 866 P.2d 675 (1994) (noting that the court "does not have unfettered discretion to compel the sale of property in a dissolution of marriage."). But in each case the trial court's consideration of the issue occurred during the pendency of the case or at the conclusion of the ... ...
  • In re Marriage of Fischer
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 13, 2009
    ... ... 36875-7-II) at ... 1478 ... [ 9 ] Furthermore, even if we were to grant ... review of this issue, Bruce has failed to provide sufficient ... argument under RAP 10.3(a)(6). Bruce generally cites In ... re Marriage of Trubner-Biria , 72 Wn.App. 858, 866 P.2d ... 675 (1994) without explanation. Moreover, ... Trubner-Biria is distinguishable. In ... Trubner-Biria , Division One of our court held that ... the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to ... allow the husband to occupy the ... ...
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Family Law Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...Benefits Plans v. Tise, 234 F.3d 415 (9th Cir. 2000) . . 33.02[3], 35.10[6][b], 35.12[6][b] Trubner-Biria, In re Marriage of, 72 Wn. App. 858, 866 P.2d 675 (1994) . . . . . . . . . . . 54.04[5][a]; 68.03 True, In re Marriage of, 104 Wn. App. 291, 16 P.3d 646 (2000) . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
  • § 3.04 RIGHT OF REIMBURSEMENT: THE EQUITABLE LIEN
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Community Property Deskbook (WSBA) (2023 Ed.) Chapter 3 Character of Ownership of Property
    • Invalid date
    ...used to improve the house in In re Estate of Meyer, 60 Wn. App. 39, 42, 802 P.2d 148 (1990). See also In re Marriage of Trubner-Biria, 72 Wn. App. 858, 866 P.2d 675 (1994). Even if a gift was not intended at the time the contribution was made, the contributor may subsequently waive the righ......
  • § 5.06 SUSPENSION AND DISSOLUTION OF THE MARRIAGE OR THE REGISTERED DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP BY THE PARTIES
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Community Property Deskbook (WSBA) (2023 Ed.) Chapter 5 Transactions and Agreements Between Married Persons, Registered Domestic Partners, and Committed Intimate Partners
    • Invalid date
    ...Other cases that illustrate the court's discretion in distributing the spouses' property include In re Marriage of Trubner-Biria, 72 Wn. App. 858, 866 P.2d 675 (1994) (restriction on occupancy by former husband of former community residence terminates upon conveyance by the former wife of h......
  • §54.04 Drafting Written Agreements
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Family Law Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 54 Marital Agreements
    • Invalid date
    ...to set a fixed deadline and value for each item of disposition. Byrne, 108 Wn.2d at 451-52. See also In re Marriage of Trubner-Biria, 72 Wn. App. 858, 866 P.2d 675 (1994), in which the court determined that after a party was paid in full for that person's interest in a home and quitclaimed ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT