Marsden v. Patane, No. 22521.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | RIVES, THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit |
| Citation | 380 F.2d 489 |
| Decision Date | 13 April 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 22521. |
| Parties | Lucy Blynn MARSDEN and Jack Marsden, Appellants, v. Sebastiano O. PATANE, Appellee. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
36 practice notes
-
Gross v. Southern Railway Company, No. 26650.
...different inferences and reach different conclusions from the facts the issue must be reserved for trial. Marsden v. Patane, 5 Cir. 1967, 380 F.2d 489, It is also well settled that in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court has no duty or function to try or decide factual issue......
-
Daly v. Sprague, No. 81-1237
...facts, then the court should deny summary judgment. Croley v. Matson Navigation Co., 434 F.2d 73, 75 (5th Cir. 1970); Marsden v. Patane, 380 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir. Moreover, the party opposing a motion for summary judgment need not respond to it with any affidavits or other evidence unless......
-
Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc., No. 89-2825
...907 F.2d 936, 947-48 (10th Cir.1990); Crawford v. La Boucherie Bernard Ltd., 815 F.2d 117, 122-23 (D.C.Cir.1987); Marsden v. Patane, 380 F.2d 489, 492 (5th Cir.1967). This might have turned into such a case if we had concluded that the plaintiff, by showing that age was a substantial factor......
-
Impossible Electronic Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc., No. 80-5890
...facts, then the court should deny summary judgment. Croley v. Matson Navigation Co., 434 F.2d 73, 75 (5th Cir. 1970); Marsden v. Patane, 380 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir. Moreover, the party opposing a motion for summary judgment need not respond to it with any affidavits or other evidence unless......
Request a trial to view additional results
34 cases
-
Gross v. Southern Railway Company, No. 26650.
...different inferences and reach different conclusions from the facts the issue must be reserved for trial. Marsden v. Patane, 5 Cir. 1967, 380 F.2d 489, It is also well settled that in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court has no duty or function to try or decide factual issue......
-
Daly v. Sprague, No. 81-1237
...facts, then the court should deny summary judgment. Croley v. Matson Navigation Co., 434 F.2d 73, 75 (5th Cir. 1970); Marsden v. Patane, 380 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir. Moreover, the party opposing a motion for summary judgment need not respond to it with any affidavits or other evidence unless......
-
Impossible Electronic Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc., No. 80-5890
...facts, then the court should deny summary judgment. Croley v. Matson Navigation Co., 434 F.2d 73, 75 (5th Cir. 1970); Marsden v. Patane, 380 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir. Moreover, the party opposing a motion for summary judgment need not respond to it with any affidavits or other evidence unless......
-
Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc., No. 89-2825
...907 F.2d 936, 947-48 (10th Cir.1990); Crawford v. La Boucherie Bernard Ltd., 815 F.2d 117, 122-23 (D.C.Cir.1987); Marsden v. Patane, 380 F.2d 489, 492 (5th Cir.1967). This might have turned into such a case if we had concluded that the plaintiff, by showing that age was a substantial factor......
Request a trial to view additional results