Marshall v. Marshall
| Decision Date | 05 May 2010 |
| Docket Number | SC 18608 |
| Citation | 296 Conn. 908,993 A.2d 467 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | SARA S. MARSHALL v. Stephen P. MARSHALL. |
Kenneth J. Bartschi and Karen L. Dowd, Hartford, in support of the petition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn.App. 120, 988 A.2d 314 (2010), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly limit its remand order to a rehearing only on the trial court's orders concerning the parties' tangible personal property?"
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Barcelo v. Barcelo
...internal quotation marks omitted.) Marshall v. Marshall, 119 Conn. App. 120, 135-36, 988 A.2d 314, cert. granted in part, 296 Conn. 908, 993 A.2d 467 (2010) (appeal withdrawn November 18, 2010). "Every improper order, however, does not necessarily merit a reconsideration of all of the trial......
-
Brown v. Brown
...quotation marks omitted.) Marshall v. Marshall, 119 Conn. App. 120, 128-29, 988 A.2d 314, cert. granted on other grounds, 296 Conn. 908, 993 A.2d 467 (2010). The plaintiff first challenges the court's alimony award by claiming that the court "prohibited the plaintiff from seeking modificati......