Marshall v. State
| Court | Court of Appeals of Maryland |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 671 A.2d 987,341 Md. 605 |
| Parties | HAROLD LOUIS MARSHALL v. STATE OF MARYLAND. |
| Decision Date | 22 February 1996 |
Claudia A. Cortese, Assistant Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for Petitioner.
Kreg Paul Greer, Assistant Attorney General (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, on brief), Baltimore, for Respondent.
Submitted to MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.
The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 22nd day of February, 1996,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for reconsideration in light of Ebb v. State, 341 Md. 578, 671 A.2d 974 (No. 117, September Term, 1994, filed February 14, 1996.) Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by Prince George's County.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marshall v. State, 75
...criminal charges. Id. at 591, 671 A.2d at 980. We summarily vacated the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Marshall v. State, 341 Md. 605, 671 A.2d 987 (1996), with directions for that court to reconsider the case in light of Ebb. On remand, the Court of Special Appeals, in a unani......
-
Marshall v. State, 75
...criminal charges. Id. at 591, 671 A.2d at 980. We summarily vacated the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Marshall v. State, 341 Md. 605, 671 A.2d 987 (1996), with directions for that court to reconsider the case in light of Ebb. On remand, the Court of Special Appeals, in a unani......