Marshall v. The State Of Ga.

CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtBLECKLEY
CitationMarshall v. The State Of Ga., 59 Ga. 154 (Ga. 1877)
Decision Date31 August 1877
PartiesAlbert Marshall, plaintiff in error. v. The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

Criminal law. Drunkenness. Insanity. Before Judge Kiddoo. Randolph Superior Court. May Term, 1877.

Reported in the opinion.

*A.Hood; L. S. Chastain, for plaintiff in error.

James T. Flewellen, solicitor general, by Jno. T. Clarke; Herbert Fielder, by Z. D. Harrison, for the state.

BLECKLEY, Judge.

The evidence indicates that the prisoner and the deceased were strangers. So far as appears, they met but the one time. This was in a bar room, at about eleven o'clock at night. Deceased was seated with another person. Prisoner walked in, and got a basket. Deceased asked him if he had eggs in the basket. Prisoner answered no,, but that he had had eggs in it. Deceased said, "Why did you not bring them to me? I would have given as much for them as anybody else, or more." Prisoner answered, "I don't know you, " and added, "One damned fool ought to have known another." Deceased said, "Yes, of course they ought; but I would have given you as much for your eggs as anybody." Prisoner said, "You are a damned liar." Deceased replied, "I don't like to take the damned lie, and you mustn't give it to me." Prisoner said, "I didn't mean any harm by it." Deceased said, "If you didn't, it is all right." Deceased had gotten up, and was standing beside the bar. Prisoner turned to leave the room, walked to the door, and when upon the step, wheeled round, saying, "I am not afraid to give you the damned lie, " presented a pistol with his left hand, and fired immediately. The parties were eight or ten feet apart. The ball took effect just above the nipple, in the left breast of deceased, and produced death in a few minutes. As soon as the pistol fired, the other person present advanced upon the prisoner to arrest him. Prisoner presented the pistol at him, and ordered him to stand back. He withdrew behind the bar, and prisoner continued to present the pistol, and kept telling him to stand back. Prisoner then ran off, and in a couple of minutes was overtakenand arrested. The prisoner had been drinking during the *day, and in the afternoon was in a long drunken sleep. After getting up from that, the evidence indicates that he was not deeply intoxicated. Shortly before the homicide he appeared to be drinking, but not very drunk. He outran a person who pursued him, and his running was pretty straight. Some evidence was adduced as to his previousgood character, most of it relating to a period of time not later than four or five years anterior to the homicide.

The jury found the prisoner guilty of murder, and his counsel made a motion for a new...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • State v. Tansimore
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 23, 1950
    ...capability to form an intent to kill and the actual intent are not one and the same. Justice Van Syckel invoked a Georgia case (Marshall v. State, 59 Ga. 154), holding: 'To be too drunk to form the intent to kill, the slayer must be too drunk to form the intent to shoot.' This, too, is an a......
  • Parker v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1998
    ...the majority's opinion that the instruction was correct. Malice is the intent to kill without provocation or justification. Marshall v. State, 59 Ga. 154 (1877). Clearly, malice may be inferred from circumstances which demonstrate a reckless disregard for human life, House v. State, 252 Ga.......
  • Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Thrift-Mart, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 22, 1981
    ...as to be unable to know, understand and intend to do the act, it cannot be said that his act was not intentional. See Marshall v. State, 59 Ga. 154 (1877); Knight v. State, 12 Ga.App. 111, 112(3), 76 S.E. 1047 (1913). There being no evidence in the instant case that Williams was so drunk on......
  • Cone v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • January 22, 1942
    ...to drunkenness, and must have been so understood by the jury. It is almost a reproduction of the language of this court in Marshall v. State, 59 Ga. 154, 156, it was said: 'A man who can voluntarily shoot is capable of malice, unless he can plead some infirmity besides drunkenness. To be to......
  • Get Started for Free