Mart v. Hill
| Decision Date | 16 April 1987 |
| Docket Number | 86-C-2200,Nos. 86-C-2191,s. 86-C-2191 |
| Citation | 505 So.2d 1120 |
| Parties | Raymond J. MART v. James E. HILL, et al. |
| Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1388 cases
-
Buxton v. Amoco Oil Co.
...(3) Defendant violated the duty with respect to plaintiff, i.e., defendant acted unreasonably; (4) Damages were sustained. Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d 1120 (La.1987); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 360 La. 542, 256 So.2d 620 (1972); Blanchard v. Riley Stoker Corp., 492 So.2d 1236 (La.App. 4......
-
Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace, Civ. A. No. 89-1690.
...from the conduct; 3. the defendant violated the duty owed; and 4. the defendant's duty is within the scope of the risk. Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d 1120 (La.1987); Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La. 542, 256 So.2d 620 (1972). The existence of a duty is a question of law. Harris v. Piz......
-
Brister v. Gulf Cent. Pipeline Co., Civ. A. No. 82-1069 to 82-1089
...to determine whether, under the facts of the case, liability exists pursuant to Louisiana Civil Code articles 2315 and 2316.7 Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d 1120 (La.1987); Forest v. State of Louisiana, through the La. Dept. of Transportation & Development, 493 So.2d 563 (La. 1986); Hill v. Lundin......
-
Roberts v. Benoit
...the duty breached? IV. Was the risk, and harm caused, within the scope of protection afforded by the duty breached? See Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d 1120, 1122 (La.1987); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La. 542, 256 So.2d 620 (1972); See also McNamara, The Duties and Risks of the Duty-Ris......
Request a trial to view additional results