Martin Luther, Plaintiff In Error v. Luther Borden Et Al Defendants In Error Rachel Luther, Complainant v. Luther Borden Et Al Defendants
Decision Date | 01 January 1849 |
Citation | 7 How. 1,12 L.Ed. 581,48 U.S. 1 |
Parties | MARTIN LUTHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LUTHER M. BORDEN ET AL. DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. * RACHEL LUTHER, COMPLAINANT, v. LUTHER M. BORDEN ET AL., DEFENDANTS |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial332 cases
-
Feehan v. Marcone
...... to point out any other hands in which this power would be more safe, and at the same time equally effectual.’ Luther v. Borden , 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 44, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849)." Morgan v. United States , supra, 801 F.2d at 450 ; see also P. Salamanca & J. Keller, "The Legislative Privilege......
-
Pellegrino v. O'Neill
...by the courts. Pacific Telephone Co. v. Oregon, 223 U.S. 118, 142, 32 S.Ct. 224, 228, 56 L.Ed. 377 (1912); Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 42-44, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849). Constitutional questions involving foreign relations, such as the termination of treaties, recognition of foreign gove......
-
Bachur v. Democratic Nat. Party
...is perceived that certain matters are better resolved by the political process than by judicial review. See, e.g., Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849). The question is whether decisions made by a major political party relative to the selection of delegates for a nation......
-
Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., No. 16-16486 & 16-16783
...magnitude, [which are] certainly entirely incompetent to the examination and decision of a Court of Justice"); Luther v. Borden , 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 42, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849) ("Congress must necessarily decide what government is established in the State before it can determine whether it is ......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 books & journal articles
-
To End Gerrymandering: The Canadian Model for Reforming the Congressional Redistricting Process in the United States
...U.S. 399, 412 (2006). 169 CROCKER, supra note 15, at 3. 170 Id. at 16. 171 See id. at 7; Williams, supra note 150. 172 Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849). 2013] TO END GERRYMANDERING 1021 which critics contended violated the United States Constitution’s republican form of government clause ......
-
"under Color Of" - What Does it Mean? - Richard H. W. Maloy
...342-43 n.82 (1992) (referring to 3 Statutes at Large 266, 271-72). 195. Sir Edward Coke, 3 Institutes 52 (1628). 196. Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1, 64 (1848). 197. 2 WMS Saunders 51, 54, 85 ER 652 (1670). 198. Id. at 655. 199. 1U.S. 312,313(Pa. S. Ct. 1788). See Ligeart v. Wiseham, 3Dyer323b......
-
Restoring the Proper Role of the Courts in Election Law: Toward a Reinvigoration of the Political Question Doctrine
...the doctrine’s applicability than answers. 31 Baker v. Carr, in purporting to establish the modern political 20. See Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1, 39 (1849) (noting that chaos would ensue if the Court invalidated Rhode Island’s system of government); see also Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S.......
-
INDEX OF CASES
...(4 Cranch 75) 9 Bombolis; Minneapolis & St. Louis R.R. v. (241 U. S. 211) 67, 243 Bonetti v. Rogers (356 U. S. 691) 174 Borden; Luther v. (7 How. 1) 228 Boston & Maine Rd. v. Hooker (233 U.S. 97) 325 Botany Mills v. United States (278 U. S. 282) 256 Boufford v. United States (239 F.2d 841 [......
Request a trial to view additional results