Martin Luther, Plaintiff In Error v. Luther Borden Et Al Defendants In Error Rachel Luther, Complainant v. Luther Borden Et Al Defendants

Decision Date01 January 1849
PartiesMARTIN LUTHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LUTHER M. BORDEN ET AL. DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. * RACHEL LUTHER, COMPLAINANT, v. LUTHER M. BORDEN ET AL., DEFENDANTS
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
329 cases
  • Feehan v. Marcone
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • January 30, 2019
    ...other hands in which this power would be more safe, and at the same time equally effectual.’ Luther v. Borden , 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 44, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849)." Morgan v. United States , supra, 801 F.2d at 450 ; see also P. Salamanca & J. Keller, "The Legislative Privilege To Judge the Qualifi......
  • Pellegrino v. O'Neill
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • October 9, 1984
    ...by the courts. Pacific Telephone Co. v. Oregon, 223 U.S. 118, 142, 32 S.Ct. 224, 228, 56 L.Ed. 377 (1912); Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 42-44, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849). Constitutional questions involving foreign relations, such as the termination of treaties, recognition of foreign gove......
  • Bachur v. Democratic Nat. Party
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • July 29, 1987
    ...is perceived that certain matters are better resolved by the political process than by judicial review. See, e.g., Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849). The question is whether decisions made by a major political party relative to the selection of delegates for a nation......
  • In re Assessment of Kan. City S. Ry. Co., Case Number: 25038
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • May 8, 1934
    ...¶35 Mr. Chief Justice Taney, in recognition of these different powers of government, in the case of Luther v. Borden, 7 HOW 1, 12 L. Ed. 581, involving litigation arising out of the Dorr Rebellion in Rhode Island in 1841, in speaking of the judicial power, said. "This tribunal, therefore, s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Restoring the Proper Role of the Courts in Election Law: Toward a Reinvigoration of the Political Question Doctrine
    • United States
    • The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy No. 20-2, April 2022
    • April 1, 2022
    ...the doctrine’s applicability than answers. 31 Baker v. Carr, in purporting to establish the modern political 20. See Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1, 39 (1849) (noting that chaos would ensue if the Court invalidated Rhode Island’s system of government); see also Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S.......
  • An Army Turned Inward: Reforming the Insurrection Act to Guard Against Abuse
    • United States
    • Journal of National Security Law & Policy No. 13-2, January 2023
    • January 1, 2023
    ..., supra note 11, at 164. 51. Vladeck, Emergency Power , supra note 11, at 165–166. 52. Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827); Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849). 53. Suppression of the Rebellion Act of 1861, ch. 25, 12 Stat. 281. 54. Vladeck, Emergency Power , supra note 11, at 168. 55. Compare......
  • To End Gerrymandering: The Canadian Model for Reforming the Congressional Redistricting Process in the United States
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 41-4, December 2013
    • December 1, 2013
    ...U.S. 399, 412 (2006). 169 CROCKER, supra note 15, at 3. 170 Id. at 16. 171 See id. at 7; Williams, supra note 150. 172 Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849). 2013] TO END GERRYMANDERING 1021 which critics contended violated the United States Constitution’s republican form of government clause ......
  • State sovereign standing: often overlooked, but not forgotten.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 64 No. 1, January 2012
    • January 1, 2012
    ...reads in its entirety: The petition for the issue of a writ of mandamus herein is denied for the want of jurisdiction. Luther v. Borden, 7 How. 1, 42; Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon, 223 U.S. 118, 150; Marshall v. Dye, 231 U.S. 250, 256, 257; Massachusetts v. Mellon,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT