Martin Luther, Plaintiff In Error v. Luther Borden Et Al Defendants In Error Rachel Luther, Complainant v. Luther Borden Et Al Defendants

Decision Date01 January 1849
Citation7 How. 1,12 L.Ed. 581,48 U.S. 1
PartiesMARTIN LUTHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LUTHER M. BORDEN ET AL. DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. * RACHEL LUTHER, COMPLAINANT, v. LUTHER M. BORDEN ET AL., DEFENDANTS
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
332 cases
  • Feehan v. Marcone
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 30 Enero 2019
    ...... to point out any other hands in which this power would be more safe, and at the same time equally effectual.’ Luther v. Borden , 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 44, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849)." Morgan v. United States , supra, 801 F.2d at 450 ; see also P. Salamanca & J. Keller, "The Legislative Privilege......
  • Pellegrino v. O'Neill
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 9 Octubre 1984
    ...by the courts. Pacific Telephone Co. v. Oregon, 223 U.S. 118, 142, 32 S.Ct. 224, 228, 56 L.Ed. 377 (1912); Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 42-44, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849). Constitutional questions involving foreign relations, such as the termination of treaties, recognition of foreign gove......
  • Bachur v. Democratic Nat. Party
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 29 Julio 1987
    ...is perceived that certain matters are better resolved by the political process than by judicial review. See, e.g., Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849). The question is whether decisions made by a major political party relative to the selection of delegates for a nation......
  • Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., No. 16-16486 & 16-16783
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 28 Octubre 2020
    ...magnitude, [which are] certainly entirely incompetent to the examination and decision of a Court of Justice"); Luther v. Borden , 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 42, 12 L.Ed. 581 (1849) ("Congress must necessarily decide what government is established in the State before it can determine whether it is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 books & journal articles
  • To End Gerrymandering: The Canadian Model for Reforming the Congressional Redistricting Process in the United States
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 41-4, December 2013
    • 1 Diciembre 2013
    ...U.S. 399, 412 (2006). 169 CROCKER, supra note 15, at 3. 170 Id. at 16. 171 See id. at 7; Williams, supra note 150. 172 Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849). 2013] TO END GERRYMANDERING 1021 which critics contended violated the United States Constitution’s republican form of government clause ......
  • "under Color Of" - What Does it Mean? - Richard H. W. Maloy
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 56-2, January 2005
    • Invalid date
    ...342-43 n.82 (1992) (referring to 3 Statutes at Large 266, 271-72). 195. Sir Edward Coke, 3 Institutes 52 (1628). 196. Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1, 64 (1848). 197. 2 WMS Saunders 51, 54, 85 ER 652 (1670). 198. Id. at 655. 199. 1U.S. 312,313(Pa. S. Ct. 1788). See Ligeart v. Wiseham, 3Dyer323b......
  • Restoring the Proper Role of the Courts in Election Law: Toward a Reinvigoration of the Political Question Doctrine
    • United States
    • The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy No. 20-2, April 2022
    • 1 Abril 2022
    ...the doctrine’s applicability than answers. 31 Baker v. Carr, in purporting to establish the modern political 20. See Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1, 39 (1849) (noting that chaos would ensue if the Court invalidated Rhode Island’s system of government); see also Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S.......
  • INDEX OF CASES
    • United States
    • Briefing and Arguing Federal Appeals Chapter XIV
    • Invalid date
    ...(4 Cranch 75) 9 Bombolis; Minneapolis & St. Louis R.R. v. (241 U. S. 211) 67, 243 Bonetti v. Rogers (356 U. S. 691) 174 Borden; Luther v. (7 How. 1) 228 Boston & Maine Rd. v. Hooker (233 U.S. 97) 325 Botany Mills v. United States (278 U. S. 282) 256 Boufford v. United States (239 F.2d 841 [......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT