Martin Marietta Materials v. Kansas DOT
| Docket Number | 13-3314 |
| Decision Date | 13 January 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
69 cases
-
Caldwell v. Univ. of N.M. Bd. of Regents
...protections. Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 701, 96 S.Ct. 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976). See Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Dept. of Transp., 810 F.3d 1161, 1184 (10th Cir. 2016) ("Damage to reputation alone ... is not sufficient."); Gwinn v. Awmiller, 354 F.3d 1211, 1216 (10th Cir. ......
-
Gutierrez v. Johnson & Johnson Int'l, Inc.
...leave to amend." Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Dep't of Transp. , 953 F. Supp. 2d 1176, 1181 (D. Kan. 2013), aff'd , 810 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir. 2016). The Court will consider the parties’ pending motions in light of the foregoing standards.B. The Court will deny Defendant's First ......
-
McGuire v. Nielsen
...is not determined by the particular procedure at issue,’ then no property interest exists." Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kan. Dep't of Transp., 810 F.3d 1161, 1178 (10th Cir. 2016) (quoting Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain Rural Elec. Ass'n, 319 F.3d 1211, 1217 (10th Cir. 2003)) (e......
-
Weise v. Colo. Springs
...due process rights by damaging her reputation must satisfy the "stigma-plus" standard. See Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kan. Dep't of Transp. , 810 F.3d 1161, 1184 (10th Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). Under that standard, a plaintiff must show: "(1) governmental defama......
Get Started for Free