Martin v. Blackburn, 77-3149

Decision Date27 September 1978
Docket NumberNo. 77-3149,77-3149
Citation581 F.2d 94
PartiesOliver MARTIN, Jr. and Joseph White, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Frank BLACKBURN, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Summary Calendar. *
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Oliver Martin, Jr., pro se.

Joseph White, pro se.

J. Marvin Montgomery, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.

Before MORGAN, CLARK and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellants, inmates at Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana, appeal the dismissal of their civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several state prison and corrections department officials. Appellants' complaint challenges the manner in which the penitentiary's Adult Rules, Regulations and Disciplinary Procedures were amended, alleging that the Louisiana Administrative Procedures Act, La.R.S. 49:951-968 was not followed.

As we have previously stated, "The claim that state officials have failed to follow the procedural provisions of state law, without more, does not aver a cause of action under § 1983. McDowell v. Texas, 465 F.2d 1342 (5th Cir. 1972) (en banc)." Shields v. Hopper, 519 F.2d 1131, 1132 (5th Cir. 1975). No matter how liberally the complaint in this case is construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), no set of facts, if proved, would entitle the appellants to relief. Accordingly, the district court's dismissal of the action is correct. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); See also Howard v. Lemmons,547 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1977).

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Braud v. Painter
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • February 1, 1990
    ...citing, Hamilton v. Chaffin, 506 F.2d 904 (5th Cir.1975); Gandy v. Panama City, 505 F.2d 630 (5th Cir.1974); and, Martin v. Blackburn, 581 F.2d 94 (5th Cir.1978). Under this burden to prove probable cause, the defendant must "demonstrate that at the moment each of these arrests was made, th......
  • Adams v. Thompson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • February 16, 1983
    ...law, not state law. Hamilton v. Chaffin, 506 F.2d 904 (5th Cir.1975); Gandy v. Panama City, 505 F.2d 630 (5th Cir.1974); Martin v. Blackburn, 581 F.2d 94 (5th Cir. 1978). The probable cause burden which defendant bore was to demonstrate that at the moment each of these arrests was made, the......
  • Taylor v. Kan. Dep't of Health
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • August 2, 2013
    ...Amendment due process violation); Harris v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 817 F.2d 1525, 1527–28 (11th Cir.1987); Martin v. Blackburn, 581 F.2d 94, 94 (5th Cir.1978) (“ ‘The claim that state officials have failed to follow the procedural provisions of state law, without more, does not aver a cau......
  • Brown v. Temple
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • March 29, 2013
    ...state law. See Marshall v. Lynn, 3 F.3d 440 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1020, 114 S.Ct. 1402, 128 LEd.2d 75 (1994); Martin v. Blackburn, 581 F.2d 94 (5lh Cir. 1978) (holding that a "claim that state officials have failed to follow the procedural provisions of state law, without ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT