Martin v. Orgain
Decision Date | 16 November 1909 |
Docket Number | 1,908. |
Citation | 174 F. 772 |
Parties | MARTIN v. ORGAIN. [1] |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
In the matter of E. H. Lowe Company the appellant filed before the referee the following claim:
'At Ft. Worth, in said district of Texas, on the 17th day of July, A.D. 1908, came Julia Martin of Ft. Worth, in the county of Tarrant, in said district of Texas, and made oath and says:
'That E. H. Lowe Company, a corporation, against which a petition for adjudication of bankruptcy had been filed and which has heretofore been adjudged bankrupt, was at and before the filing of said petition, and still is, justly and truly indebted to said deponent for a sum of money representing the rents due and to become due for that portion of the current contract year according to the terms of a certain lease made by deponent to and with said bankrupt, extending from the first day of January, A.D. 1908, to the first day of September, A.D. 1908. That the total amount of said indebtedness for said period is the sum of thirty-eight hundred, fifty-six and 18/100 dollars ($3,856.18), as shown by the statement of account hereto attached marked 'Exhibit A' and made part of this proof; that no part of said debt has been paid except the sum of eighteen hundred, fifty-eight and 78/100 dollars ($1,858.78), as shown by the items credited on said attached account; that the consideration of said debt is rents due and to become due as aforesaid; that there are no offsets or counterclaims to said indebtedness except as set forth in said attached account, and that the balance after allowing same is the sum of nineteen hundred, ninety-seven and 40/100 dollars ($1,997.40); that no note has been received for said indebtedness or any part thereof, and no judgment has been obtained for same; that the only security held by this deponent for said debt is a landlord's lien on the property of the said bankrupt on the premises let in said lease secured by the said contract of lease and by the statute law of the state of Texas, and that by agreement whatever rights in said bankruptcy deponent has under and by virtue of said lien extend to the funds in the hands of the trustee for said bankrupt derived from the sale of the property of said bankrupt on said leased premises at the time of said bankruptcy; that said claim is entitled by law to priority of payment out of the assets of said bankrupt in the hands of its trustee. Julia Martin.
'Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of July, A.D. 1908.
'Notary Public in and for Tarrant County, Texas.'
The trustee answered the said claim, in substance, charging that as to the rent due after the adjudication in bankruptcy, it was not a provable claim, and he prayed that the same should not be allowed.
A hearing was had before the referee on an agreed statement of facts as follows:
'In the matter of the claim of Mrs. Julia Martin against the estate of the bankrupt aforesaid for rents, the following facts are agreed to:
'The E. H. Lowe Company, a corporation, was adjudicated a bankrupt on the 9th day of March, 1908.
'That the contract of which the following is a copy, was duly executed and was in force at the date of said bankruptcy as an obligation of the said E. H. Lowe Company, it having acquired the rights of E. H. Lowe named in said contract as the original lessee.
'The stock in trade of the said bankrupt remained on the premises described in said contract of lessee as the property of said bankrupt estate from the date of said adjudication to and including the 9th day of April, 1908 the trustee in bankruptcy being in control of said premises from the date of his election to and including the said 9th day of April, 1908, when he sold the said stock in trade.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commercial Credit Co. v. Davidson
...134, 30 S.Ct. 368, 54 L.Ed. 418, 23 A.B.R. 635; In re Georgia Handle Co., 5 Cir., 109 F. 632, 48 C.C.A. 571, 6 A.B.R. 472; Martin v. Orgain, 5 Cir., 174 F. 772, 98 C. C.A. 246, 23 A.B.R. 454; Norris v. Trenholm, 5 Cir., 209 F. 827, 126 C.C. A. 551, 31 A.B.R. 353; Pugh v. Loisel, 5 Cir., 219......
-
In re Brannon
...Bank (C. C. A.) 145 F. 466, and Eggleston v. Birmingham Purchasing Co. (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 529; a Texas rent lien in Martin v. Orgain (C. C. A.) 174 F. 772, and In re McLaughlin (D. C.) 10 F.(2d) 810; a materialman's lien in Re Oconee Milling Co. (C. C. A.) 109 F. 866, and In re Georgia Ha......
-
Courtney v. Fidelity Trust Co.
...cases of In re Martin, before cited, 193 Fed.at page 846, 113 C.C.A. 627, and 201 Fed.at page 38, 119 C.C.A. 363. Furthermore, in Martin v. Orgain, supra, it was not found definitely to decide that the claim for rent to accrue after bankruptcy was either required to be proved or that it mig......
-
In re Wall
...the debt may not be provable against the general estate." Lontos v. Coppard (C. C. A.) 246 F. 803, 805, 22 A. L. R. 1308; Martin v. Orgain, 174 F. 772, 98 C. C. A. 246, certiorari denied 216 U. S. 619, 30 S. Ct. 574, 54 L. Ed. 640; Fudickar v. Glenn (C. C. A.) 237 F. Because in Mississippi ......