Martin v. Stanfield

CourtIndiana Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPer Curiam.
CitationMartin v. Stanfield, 17 Ind. 336 (Ind. 1861)
Decision Date09 December 1861
PartiesMartin v. Stanfield

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded.

H. W Chase and J. A. Wilstach, for the appellant.

John Stanfield, for the appellee.

OPINION

Per Curiam.

In this case the appellee, the plaintiff below, had judgment against the appellant upon the following facts, agreed upon, namely:

"In May 1853, a special meeting of the voters of Wabash township, of said county, was duly held, and a tax of fifty cents on the hundred dollars of taxable property was voted, for the purpose of building school houses, and continuing schools after the public funds should have been exhausted and to defray the general expenses of such schools, as provided for in § 130 of an 'Act to provide for a general and uniform system of common schools, &c approved June 14, 1852.' The plaintiff was a resident of said township at the time, the owner of property therein, and was assessed and taxed the sum of twenty-one dollars and seventy cents, under and by virtue of said vote. In December, 1853, said plaintiff called at the office of said defendant, then and still the treasurer of said county, and paid to him said tax with his other taxes, they at the time supposing the same to be legal. The said sum of twenty-one dollars, seventy cents, is still in the hands of said Martin, as such treasurer, and has been demanded by said plaintiff, and payment thereof refused by the defendant."

The error assigned is, that the judgment is erroneous, because the payment was voluntary.

That the tax was improperly assessed,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Bd. of Com'rs of Boone Cnty. v. Adler
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 6, 1922
    ...a timely suit against the collecting officer, he might obtain relief by injunction. Greencastle Township v. Black, 5 Ind. 557;Martin v. Stanfield, 17 Ind. 336;Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Lafayette, 22 Ind. 263;English v. Smock, 34 Ind. 122, 7 Am. Rep. 215;Shoemaker v. Board, 36 Ind. 175;Sim v. ......
  • Board of Commissioners of Boone County v. Adler
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 6, 1922
    ...the collecting officer, he might obtain relief by injunction. Greencastle Township, etc. v. Black (1854), 5 Ind. 557; Martin v. Stanfield (1861), 17 Ind. 336; Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Lafayette 22 Ind. 262; English v. Smock (1870), 34 Ind. 115, 7 Am. Rep. 215; Shoemaker v. Board, etc. (1871)......
  • State ex rel.McKenzie v. Casteel
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1887
    ...Com'rs St. Joseph Co. v. Ruckman, 57 Ind. 96;City of Indianapolis v. Langsdale, 29 Ind. 486;Lima Tp. v. Jenks, 20 Ind. 301;Martin v. Stanfield, 17 Ind. 336;Lima Tp. v. Jenks, 20 Ind. 301. In City of Logansport v. Humphrey, 84 Ind. 467, it was said: “The general rule is beyond dispute that a......
  • State, ex rel. MacKenzie v. Casteel
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1887
    ...Ind. 528; Board, etc., v. Ruckman, 57 Ind. 96; City of Indianapolis v. Langsdale, 29 Ind. 486; Lima Tp. v. Jenks, 20 Ind. 301; Martin v. Stanfield, 17 Ind. 336; Jenks v. Lima Tp., 17 Ind. In City of Logansport v. Humphrey, 84 Ind. 467, it was said: "The general rule is beyond dispute that t......
  • Get Started for Free