Martin v. State, No. 877S557

Docket NºNo. 877S557
Citation372 N.E.2d 181, 267 Ind. 583
Case DateFebruary 10, 1978
CourtSupreme Court of Indiana

Page 181

372 N.E.2d 181
267 Ind. 583
Phillip R. MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee.
No. 877S557.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
Feb. 10, 1978.

[267 Ind. 584]

Page 182

Peyton & Giddings, Lebanon, for appellant.

Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Dennis K. McKinney, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

GIVAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree. He was sentenced to 15 to 25 years.

Appellant first claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress a statement made by him to police officers. Three days after appellant's five and one-half month old daughter died, two police officers went to his parents' home and asked to talk to appellant. Appellant accompanied them to the Zionsville police station. There his constitutional [267 Ind. 585] rights were read to him. Appellant himself read and signed the waiver form. In the questioning that followed appellant admitted striking his baby daughter. The session was not recorded and the officers therefore testified at trial as to his statements. Appellant's motion to suppress was on the ground that he was emotionally distraught and fatigued; that the police officers threatened him with being jailed and that therefore he told the police officers what they wanted to hear.

The trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to the motion and on the basis of the evidence found the statement made by appellant was freely and voluntarily given and ruled that it was admissible. This Court has held that in determining the voluntariness of a waiver of rights, the test is whether " . . . looking at all the circumstances, the confession was free and voluntary and not induced by any violence, threats, promises, or other improper influences." Nacoff v. State (1971) 256 Ind. 97, 101, 267 N.E.2d 165, 167. This question is to be decided by the trial court, and when the evidence of voluntariness is conflicting, this Court will not reverse the trial court so long as there is sufficient evidence of probative value to support the ruling. Lane v. State (1977) Ind., 364 N.E.2d 756; French v. State (1977) Ind., 362 N.E.2d 834.

Although appellant argues that he was emotionally distraught at the time, the record shows that the questioning took place three days after the death of the daughter. There is nothing in the record to show any unusual situation which would nullify appellant's statements. Furthermore, the record shows that on the same day the child died appellant was questioned by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 practice notes
  • O'Conner v. State, No. 2-378A99
    • United States
    • Indiana Court of Appeals of Indiana
    • November 29, 1978
    ..."child abuse." So far as it goes, we find this argument eminently proper. Our Supreme Court recently held in Martin v. State, (1978) Ind.,372 N.E.2d 181, 182, that evidence of alleged acts of child abuse was proper to show the premeditation and malice of a defendant convicted of second degr......
  • Bryan v. State, No. 1181S327
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • June 28, 1983
    ...of the intent to kill. Harris v. State, (1981) Ind., 425 N.E.2d 112; Moore v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 558; Martin v. State, (1978) 267 Ind. 583, 372 N.E.2d 181. This evidence of prior attacks on the decedent was not rendered inadmissible merely because it also tended to show other cr......
  • Wells v. State, No. 282S63
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • November 12, 1982
    ...admissible in a homicide prosecution as evidence and intent to kill. Moore v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 558; Martin v. State, (1978) 267 Ind. 583, 372 N.E.2d 181. The only case cited by appellant in support of this argument is Greer v. State, (1969) 252 Ind. 20, 245 N.E.2d 158. This ca......
  • O'Conner v. State, No. 180S18
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • January 24, 1980
    ...purpose, identification or common scheme or plan. Alexander v. State (1976) Ind.App., 340 N.E.2d 366. In Martin v. State (1978) Ind., 372 N.E.2d 181, this Court held that the admission of evidence of alleged acts of child abuse to show premeditation and malice was proper. We believe the jur......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • O'Conner v. State, No. 2-378A99
    • United States
    • Indiana Court of Appeals of Indiana
    • November 29, 1978
    ..."child abuse." So far as it goes, we find this argument eminently proper. Our Supreme Court recently held in Martin v. State, (1978) Ind.,372 N.E.2d 181, 182, that evidence of alleged acts of child abuse was proper to show the premeditation and malice of a defendant convicted of second degr......
  • Bryan v. State, No. 1181S327
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • June 28, 1983
    ...of the intent to kill. Harris v. State, (1981) Ind., 425 N.E.2d 112; Moore v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 558; Martin v. State, (1978) 267 Ind. 583, 372 N.E.2d 181. This evidence of prior attacks on the decedent was not rendered inadmissible merely because it also tended to show other cr......
  • Wells v. State, No. 282S63
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • November 12, 1982
    ...admissible in a homicide prosecution as evidence and intent to kill. Moore v. State, (1981) Ind., 414 N.E.2d 558; Martin v. State, (1978) 267 Ind. 583, 372 N.E.2d 181. The only case cited by appellant in support of this argument is Greer v. State, (1969) 252 Ind. 20, 245 N.E.2d 158. This ca......
  • O'Conner v. State, No. 180S18
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • January 24, 1980
    ...purpose, identification or common scheme or plan. Alexander v. State (1976) Ind.App., 340 N.E.2d 366. In Martin v. State (1978) Ind., 372 N.E.2d 181, this Court held that the admission of evidence of alleged acts of child abuse to show premeditation and malice was proper. We believe the jur......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT