Martin v. Warren

Decision Date30 June 1896
Citation67 N.W. 897,109 Mich. 584
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesMARTIN ET AL. v. WARREN ET AL.

Appeal from circuit court, Wayne county, in chancery; Oscar Adams, Judge.

Suit to enforce mechanic's lien by James J. Martin and others, co-partners as M. C. Martin & Co., against Charles W. Warren and others. From a decree for complainants, defendant Kitty M. O'Donnell alone appeals. Reversed.

John H. McDonald (T. E. Tarsney and, W. W. Wicker, of counsel), for appellant.

Bowen, Douglas & Whiting, for appellees.

HOOKER, J.

This case is ruled by Sterner v. Haas (Mich.) 66 N.W. 348. It is contended that it should not be held to fall within the spirit, although within the letter, because in the present case more than 60 days had elapsed after the full completion of the work by the contractor at the time the bill was filed, and hence there was no chance for a lien to be perfected and enforced against said premises by subcontractors, laborers, or material men. If this contention is sound, the landowner must determine, at his peril, when said 60 days expires. If he be convinced by the contractor that the time has expired, and make payment, others asserting liens filed later may be able to convince a court to the contrary, and his payment be lost. It is no great hardship for a contractor asserting a lien to furnish to the landowner the statutory statement that shall make him safe, before subjecting him to costs of litigation upon the contractor's lien, though he might be able to show that the time within which the premises were subject to subcontractors' liens had actually expired; and it is no more than just that the landowner should be protected from unnecessary annoyance and risk of loss. Such appears to be the requirement of the act, and the case is therefore reversed, and bill dismissed, with costs of both courts.

LONG, C.J., did not sit. The other justices concurred.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Martin v. Warren
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 30 June 1896
    ...109 Mich. 58467 N.W. 897MARTIN ET AL.v.WARREN ET AL.Supreme Court of Michigan.June 30, Appeal from circuit court, Wayne county, in chancery; Oscar Adams, Judge. Suit to enforce mechanic's lien by James J. Martin and others, co-partners as M. C. Martin & Co., against Charles W. Warren and ot......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT