Martineau v. Helgemoe, 7484
| Decision Date | 31 October 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 7484,7484 |
| Parties | , 3 Media L. Rep. 1597 Frederick J. MARTINEAU v. Raymond HELGEMOE, Warden. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Shute, Engel & Frasier, Exeter (Francis J. Frasier, Exeter, orally), for plaintiff.
David H. Souter, Atty. Gen., and Richard B. Michaud, Concord, for defendant.
The issue in this petition for a writ of habeas corpus is whether plaintiff was denied the right to a public trial.
Plaintiff was tried and convicted of attempted burglary in a jury-waived trial in March, 1976. He filed his petition claiming that he was denied a public trial because during part of his trial the courtroom doors were locked and the public was excluded. The matter was remanded to the superior court because disputed facts were involved. See LaBelle v. State, 108 N.H. 241, 231 A.2d 480 (1967).
A hearing was held before the same justice who tried the case who made certain findings and dismissed the petition. Plaintiff's exceptions were transferred by Perkins, J.
It appears to be undisputed that during hearings on the defendant's motion to suppress evidence that the state's and defendant's witnesses were sequestered, and the doors of the courtroom were locked except to admit them one at a time. This was done at the request of counsel, and the defendant had no objection to that procedure. When the trial on the merits began no one directed that the doors be kept locked and the public excluded, but for some reason this was done without the knowledge of the court.
During the trial on the merits the order to sequester the witnesses continued and this may have accounted for the misunderstanding on the part of court officers regarding the locked doors.
At some time, it was learned by defense counsel that the doors were locked. During a discussion with Martineau, his lawyer told him he was not disturbed and it was probably to his advantage because it would keep adverse press coverage down and also would prevent the police from planting someone in the courtroom to report back the testimony to the next witness thus reducing the effectiveness of the sequestration order. His counsel testified that he thought Martineau agreed with him at that time. Later when Martineau brought up the subject, counsel told him that if he wanted to "bring it to the court's attention that he had a perfect right to stand up and tell the court that at any time he wanted to." At no time did Martineau or counsel inform the court of the locked doors. The court learned of the locked doors through a bailiff who stated that he had heard "some complaint . . . by persons in the corridor and by Mr. Martineau." The court ordered the doors opened and they remained open from March 15 until the end of the trial on March 17. Unknown to the court however, the doors were locked for the first three days of the six-day trial.
"Although it has been said...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gannett Co Inc v. Pasquale
...the Due Process Clause of its Constitution, Pt. 1, Art. 15, requires that criminal trials be held in public. Martineau v. Helgemoe, 117 N.H. 841, 842, 379 A.2d 1040, 1041 (1977). Maryland by judicial decision requires open proceedings. Dutton v. State, 123 Md. 373, 386-387, 91 A. 417, 422-4......
-
McGranahan v. Dahar
...of judicial proceedings are public documents and events. Thomson v. Cash, 117 N.H. 653, 377 A.2d 135 (1977); Martineau v. Helgemoe, 117 N.H. 841, 379 A.2d 1040 (1977); See Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 95 S.Ct. 1029, 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975). A person's reputation undoubtedly m......
-
Martineau v. Perrin
...Court evidentiary hearing, made specific findings and concluded that petitioner had waived his right to a public trial. Martineau v. Helgemoe, 379 A.2d 1040 (N.H.1977). 2 The pertinent portions of its opinion At some time, it was learned by defense counsel that the doors were locked. During......
-
State v. Turcotte
...to guarantee a defendant's right to a public trial. State v. Weber, 137 N.H. 193, 196, 624 A.2d 967 (1993) ; see Martineau v. Helgemoe, 117 N.H. 841, 842, 379 A.2d 1040 (1977). The values furthered by the public trial guarantee include ensuring that the defendant "is fairly dealt with and n......
-
"incorporation" of the Criminal Procedure Amendments: the View from the States
...his right to a public trial for those portions from which spectators are so excluded") (emphasis added). 238. See Martineau v. Helgemoe, 379 A.2d 1040, 1041 (N.H. 1977) ("[A]lthough there is no specific reference to the right to a public trial in our state constitution, it is protected by t......