Martinez v. Ashcroft, MONTERO-MARTINEZ

Decision Date30 May 2001
Docket NumberMONTERO-HERNANDE,P,No. 99-70596,MONTERO-MARTINEZ,99-70596
Citation249 F.3d 1156
Parties(9th Cir. 2001) HECTOR; GREGORIO PEDROetitioners, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

NOTE: OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Patel v. U.S. Attorney Gen.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 19, 2020
    ...terms, appears to encompass all decisions regarding cancellation of removal, including determinations of statutory eligibility." 249 F.3d 1156, 1158 (9th Cir.), as amended (May 30, 2001), rev'd, 277 F.3d at 1137.After the Supreme Court decided St. Cyr , the Ninth Circuit granted Montero-Mar......
  • Fahim v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • January 9, 2002
    ...courts have, in dicta, used the section as an example of a clear congressional limit on courts' jurisdiction. Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 249 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir.2001) (section 1158(a)(3) unambiguously limits federal court jurisdiction); Van Dinh v. Reno, 197 F.3d 427, 433 (10th Cir.1999) ......
  • Hakeem v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • December 5, 2001
    ...habeas corpus before the district court and a petition for habeas corpus review is not before this court. See Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 249 F.3d 1156, 1160 (9th Cir. 2001) (deciding not to consider habeas corpus jurisdiction in petition for review from removal order where petitioner arg......
  • Martinez-Lopez, v. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the US, MARTINEZ-LOPE
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 28, 2001
    ...voluntary departure. The Board affirmed the Immigration Judge's decision without opinion. We recently held in Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft , 249 F.3d 1156, 1158 (9th Cir. 2001), that pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), there is no jurisdiction to review the statutory eligibility for ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT