Martinez v. Ashcroft, MONTERO-MARTINEZ
Decision Date | 30 May 2001 |
Docket Number | MONTERO-HERNANDE,P,No. 99-70596,MONTERO-MARTINEZ,99-70596 |
Citation | 249 F.3d 1156 |
Parties | (9th Cir. 2001) HECTOR; GREGORIO PEDROetitioners, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
NOTE: OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
Patel v. U.S. Attorney Gen.
...terms, appears to encompass all decisions regarding cancellation of removal, including determinations of statutory eligibility." 249 F.3d 1156, 1158 (9th Cir.), as amended (May 30, 2001), rev'd, 277 F.3d at 1137.After the Supreme Court decided St. Cyr , the Ninth Circuit granted Montero-Mar......
-
Fahim v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
...courts have, in dicta, used the section as an example of a clear congressional limit on courts' jurisdiction. Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 249 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir.2001) (section 1158(a)(3) unambiguously limits federal court jurisdiction); Van Dinh v. Reno, 197 F.3d 427, 433 (10th Cir.1999) ......
-
Hakeem v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv.
...habeas corpus before the district court and a petition for habeas corpus review is not before this court. See Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 249 F.3d 1156, 1160 (9th Cir. 2001) (deciding not to consider habeas corpus jurisdiction in petition for review from removal order where petitioner arg......
-
Martinez-Lopez, v. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the US, MARTINEZ-LOPE
...voluntary departure. The Board affirmed the Immigration Judge's decision without opinion. We recently held in Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft , 249 F.3d 1156, 1158 (9th Cir. 2001), that pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), there is no jurisdiction to review the statutory eligibility for ca......
Request a trial to view additional results