Martinez v. Astrue, 10-5863

Decision Date19 October 2011
Docket NumberNO. 10-5863,10-5863
PartiesHIRAM IRIZARRY MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania

CIVIL ACTION

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2011, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Docket No. 20), Plaintiff's Objections (Docket No. 21), and Defendant's Response (Docket No. 22), and upon careful review of the administrative record, it is hereby ORDERED, as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. Plaintiff's Request for Review is DENIED; and
4. JUDGMENT is ENTERED in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This case is now closed.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, J.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Torres v. Berryhill, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2441
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • August 23, 2019
    ...judge's analysis without simply rehashing arguments already raised to the magistrate judge"); Martinez v. Astrue, No. 10-5863, 2011 WL 4974445, at *3-4 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2011) (citing cases, and stating that "[r]epeatedly, courts, both within and outside of the Third Circuit, have held tha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT