Martinez v. Maher, 1239
| Decision Date | 05 June 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 1239,D,1239 |
| Citation | 631 F.2d 5 |
| Parties | Judith MARTINEZ et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward MAHER, Defendant-Appellant. ocket 80-7242. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Hugh Barber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn. (Carl R. Ajello, Atty. Gen., and Francis J. MacGregor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
Robert F. Echols, Derby, Conn. (Edward Mattison, New Haven, Conn., and Joanne Miner, Danielson, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, TIMBERS, Circuit Judge, and MISHLER, District Judge. *
On this appeal from a judgment entered in the District of Connecticut, T. F. Gilroy Daly, District Judge, requiring recalculation of benefits payable to "families of one" under the Aid To Families With Dependent Children program, 42 U.S.C. § 601, et seq. (1976), we affirm on the opinion of Judge Daly dated February 27, 1980. 485 F.Supp. 1264.
* Hon. Jacob Mishler, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McCoog By and Through Ferguson v. Hegstrom
...household for the purpose of computing the ADC grant. See Martinez v. Maher, 485 F.Supp. 1264, 1271-72 (D.Conn.), aff'd per curiam, 631 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1980); Nelson v. Likins, 389 F.Supp. 1234, 1238 (D.Minn.1974), aff'd per curiam, 510 F.2d 414 (8th Cir. 1972); Corrigan v. Affleck, 523 F.S......
-
Calkins v. Blum
...Cases certainly follow the literal language of this provision. See Martinez v. Maher, 485 F.Supp. 1264 (D.Conn.), aff'd, 631 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1980) (per curiam); Nelson v. Likins, 389 F.Supp. 1234 (D.Minn.1974), aff'd, 510 F.2d 414 (8th Cir. 1975); Genin v. Toia, 47 N.Y.2d 959, 393 N.E.2d 10......
-
Ward, Bittle, Miller, et al. v. Thomas
...at 39. Thus, an individual child like Fitzpatrick can constitute a "family of one" under the AFDC program. See, e.g., Martinez v. Maher, 631 F.2d 5, 5 (2d Cir. 1980). From these principles, however, the Commissioner then argues that "the [District] Court's finding that the text of 602(a)(7)......
-
Burns v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.
...benefit to its present value. Id. at 1078 (emphasis added); see also Martinez v. Maher, 485 F.Supp. 1264, 1269 (D.Conn.), aff'd, 631 F.2d 5 (2d Cir.1980). We are in agreement with the Seventh Circuit and the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court below. Where the heart of a cause of ac......