Martinez v. Rivera, 4357.

Decision Date16 April 1952
Docket NumberNo. 4357.,4357.
Citation196 F.2d 192
PartiesMARTINEZ et al. v. RIVERA et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Quincy D. Adams, Albuquerque, N. M., and Harry L. Bigbee, Santa Fe, N. M., for appellants.

Oliver Seth, Santa Fe, N. M. (Seth & Montgomery, Santa Fe, N. M., on the brief), for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

The question presented on this appeal is whether the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant, a grant from the Republic of Mexico, situated partly in the State of New Mexico and partly in the State of Colorado, is a community grant or a private grant.

The Act of July 22, 1854, 10 Stat. 308, created the office of Surveyor General of New Mexico. On September 10, 1856, the Surveyor General of New Mexico, pursuant to § 8 of such Act, made a report to Congress on the claim of Francisco Martinez for confirmation of the grant, in which the Surveyor General recommended the confirmation of the grant in the following language:

"The Provincial Deputation was authorized by the laws of the Republic of Mexico to make donations of land to individuals, and this case being covered by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of `J. C. Freemont vs. the U. S.\' the Grant made to Manuel Martinez, of which Francisco Martinez is the present claimant, is deemed by this office to be a good and valid grant, and the Congress of the United States is hereby respectfully recommended to confirm the same, and cause a Patent to be issued therefore by the proper Department, and the land embraced within the boundaries set forth in said grant to be surveyed."

The report was numbered 33.

The grant was confirmed by § 3 of the Act of June 21, 1860, 12 Stat. 71. The material part of § 3 reads as follows:

"Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the private land claims in the Territory of New Mexico, as recommended for confirmation by said surveyor-general in his reports, and abstract marked exhibit A, as communicated to Congress by the Secretary of the Interior in his letter dated the third of February eighteen hundred and sixty, and numbered from twenty to thirty-eight, both inclusive, be, and the same are hereby, confirmed, * *."

On February 21, 1881, a patent for the grant was issued to Francisco Martinez, his heirs and assigns.

In 1907, the legislature of the Territory of New Mexico enacted a statute for the management, control, and government of community land grants. N.M.S.L.1907, ch. 42, p. 57. The statute is now found in Art. 1, ch. 9, N.M.Stat.1941 Ann. §§ 9-101 to 9-117.

Section 9-102 in part provides:

"Application of article. This article shall apply to all grants of land made by the government of Spain, or by the government of Mexico, to any community, town, colony or pueblo, or to any individual for the purpose of founding or establishing any community, town, colony or pueblo; * *."

Section 9-103 provides that the management and control of all the grants to which the article is applicable is "vested in a board of trustees, to be known as the `Board of Trustees of the ____ Land Grant'" and that such board shall have power "to control, care for and manage the said grant; * * * to sue and be sued; * * * to sell, convey, lease, or mortgage so much of the land grant or real estate under its control as aforesaid as is held in common; * * * to adopt and use an official seal; * * * to appoint judges and clerks of election at all elections herein provided for, subsequent to the first, and to canvass the votes cast thereat."

Purporting to act under § 9-106, the Board of County Commissioners of Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, undertook to call a special election to be held on April 2, 1951, for the purpose of electing five members as a board of trustees of the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant, and designated and appointed election officials, designated polling places, and instructed the secretary of the Board of County Commissioners to give notice of such election. Notice of such election was given.

On March 26, 1951, the plaintiffs below, appellees here, owners of large areas of land within the boundaries of the grant, brought this action against the members of the Board of County Commissioners of Rio Arriba County seeking an injunction restraining them from proceeding further with such election, from canvassing votes at such election, and from issuing certificates of election.

Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and the requisite amount in controversy.

During all the period intervening between the date of the confirmation of the grant and the action of the Board of County Commissioners on March 1, 1951, the grant had been managed and controlled as a private land grant and no action had ever been taken by anyone to elect a Board of Trustees to control and manage such grant.

By its judgment, the trial court granted a permanent injunction as prayed for in the complaint.

The duty of providing the mode for securing and establishing claims to Spanish and Mexican land titles and fulfilling the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo developed upon the political department of the government.1 Congress could either discharge that duty itself or delegate it to the judicial department.2

It was not until the Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 854...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Sanchez v. Taylor, 8600.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • June 23, 1967
    ...U.S. 325, 7 S.Ct. 1015, 30 L.Ed. 949, on rehearing 122 U.S. 365, 7 S.Ct. 1271, 30 L.Ed. 1211. This court too has so held. Martinez v. Rivera, 10 Cir., 196 F.2d 192, cert. denied 344 U.S. 828, 73 S.Ct. 30, 97 L.Ed. 644; Flores v. Bruesselbach, 10 Cir., 149 F.2d 616. See also, H. N. D. Land C......
  • Rivera v. Brazos Lodge Corp., 18891
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1991
    ...Grant were largely laid to rest in previous litigation. See HND Land Co. v. Suazo, 44 N.M. 547, 105 P.2d 744 (1940); Martinez v. Rivera, 196 F.2d 192 (10th Cir.1952) and Martinez v. Mundy, 61 N.M. 872 , 295 P.2d 209 The Plaintiff has also made previous claims identical to those made in this......
  • PAYNE LAND & LIVESTOCK COMPANY v. Archuleta
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • February 1, 1960
    ...set forth the elements which must be established before adverse possession can be adjudged. The second case is that of Martinez v. Rivera, 10 Cir., 196 F.2d 192. The gist of this decision is that the Act of Congress confirming private land claims in the New Mexico Territory, as recommended ......
  • State v. Corporation of Abiquiu Tierra Amarilla Land Grant, 10939
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • December 7, 1977
    ...and even threatened to evict the owners from their respective lands. The court also determined that due to the holdings of Martinez v. Rivera, 196 F.2d 192 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 828, 73 S.Ct. 30, 97 L.Ed. 644 (1952), and Flores v. Bruesselbach, 149 F.2d 616 (10th Cir. 1945), t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 1 - § 1.1 • MEXICAN GRANTS
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Real Property Law (CBA) Chapter 1 Origin of Colorado Titles
    • Invalid date
    ...644 (1876) (Sangre de Cristo grant); Flores v. Bruesselbach, 149 F.2d 616 (10th Cir. 1945) (Tierra Amarilla grant); Martinez v. Rivera, 196 F.2d 192 (10th Cir. 1952) (Tierra Amarilla grant); Sanchez v. Taylor, 377 F.2d 733 (10th Cir. 1967) (Sangre de Cristo grant).[7] See, e.g., Act of July......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT