Martinez v. United States
Decision Date | 10 January 1994 |
Docket Number | No. 93-6890.,93-6890. |
Citation | 510 U.S. 1062 |
Parties | Martinez v. United States. |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial27 cases
-
U.S. v. Lowe
... Page 401 ... 954 F.Supp. 401 ... UNITED STATES of America ... Paul E. LOWE, Defendant ... Criminal No. 95-10404-PBS ... United ... Bonds, 12 F.3d 540, 550-68 (6th Cir.1993); United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1195-98 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062, 114 S.Ct. 734, 126 L.Ed.2d ... ...
-
U.S. v. Beasley
... Page 1440 ... 102 F.3d 1440 ... 65 USLW 2471, 46 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1 ... UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, ... Reginald Pierre BEASLEY, Appellant ... UNITED STATES of ... See United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1197 (8th Cir.1993) (citing United States v. Jakobetz, 955 F.2d 786, 799-800 (2d ... ...
-
Taylor v. State
... ... United States. 4 The sole witness was State's expert Dr. Jay S. Hanous, faculty member of the Department ... 1989) ... 44 Id. at ----, 113 S.Ct. at 2796 ... 46 Id. In U.S. v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1197 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1062, 114 S.Ct. 734, 126 L.Ed.2d 697 ... ...
-
Thomas v. State
... ... In regard to any possible mitigating circumstances, the trial court's order states: "The Court finds that the defendant chose to adopt the testimony of his mother and former wife, ... the "plain-error" standard, we find it appropriate and useful in this case to consider the United States Supreme Court's "clarification" of the standard for "plain-error" review, as expressed in ... , [and, thus,] an instruction on circumstantial evidence will be deemed superfluous." Martinez v. State, 635 S.W.2d 629, 633 (Tex.App.1982) ... The evidence, particularly the fingerprint and DNA ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results