Marvel v. United States
Decision Date | 15 March 1965 |
Docket Number | M,No. 476,476 |
Citation | 13 L.Ed.2d 960,380 U.S. 262,85 S.Ct. 953 |
Parties | Wayne Gilbert MARVEL v. UNITED STATES. isc |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Wayne Gilbert Marvel, pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for a hearing as to whether petition was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mordecai v. United States
...v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). 34 315 F.2d 204 (4th Cir. 1963); see also Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960 (1965), vacating 335 F.2d 101 (5th Cir. 1964); Harper v. United States, 368 F.2d 53 (10th Cir. 35 See Andrews v. Unit......
-
Rodriguez v. Seamans
... ... Dr. Robert C. SEAMANS, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, et al ... No. 24599 ... United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit ... Argued November 1, 1971 ... Decided ... ...
-
Ralston v. Robinson, 80-2049
...was not fully apprised of the consequences of being sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act, see, e. g., Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960; Caldwell v. United States, 435 F.2d 1079 (CA10 1970); James v. United States, 388 F.2d 453 (CA5 1968); Freeman v. U......
- Cipres v. United States