Marvel v. United States

Decision Date15 March 1965
Docket NumberM,No. 476,476
Citation13 L.Ed.2d 960,380 U.S. 262,85 S.Ct. 953
PartiesWayne Gilbert MARVEL v. UNITED STATES. isc
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Wayne Gilbert Marvel, pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky, for the United States.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for a hearing as to whether petition was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence.

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • Mordecai v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • October 7, 1969
    ...v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). 34 315 F.2d 204 (4th Cir. 1963); see also Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960 (1965), vacating 335 F.2d 101 (5th Cir. 1964); Harper v. United States, 368 F.2d 53 (10th Cir. 35 See Andrews v. Unit......
  • Rodriguez v. Seamans
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • April 3, 1972
    ... ... Dr. Robert C. SEAMANS, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, et al ... No. 24599 ... United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit ... Argued November 1, 1971 ... Decided ... ...
  • Ralston v. Robinson, 80-2049
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1981
    ...was not fully apprised of the consequences of being sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act, see, e. g., Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960; Caldwell v. United States, 435 F.2d 1079 (CA10 1970); James v. United States, 388 F.2d 453 (CA5 1968); Freeman v. U......
  • Cipres v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 18, 1965
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT