Mary Deneale, Executrix of George Deneale, and Others, Plaintiffs In Error v. John Archer and John Stump, Executors of John Stump, Deceased Defendants In Error

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
CitationMary Deneale, Executrix of George Deneale, and Others, Plaintiffs In Error v. John Archer and John Stump, Executors of John Stump, Deceased Defendants In Error, 33 U.S. 526, 8 Pet. 526, 8 L.Ed. 1032 (1834)
Decision Date01 January 1834
PartiesMARY DENEALE, EXECUTRIX OF GEORGE DENEALE, AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. JOHN ARCHER AND JOHN W. STUMP, EXECUTORS OF JOHN STUMP, DECEASED, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

IN error to the circuit court of the United States for the county of Alexandria, in the District of Columbia.

Upon the opening of the record in this case, it was found that the writ of error had been issued in the name of Mary Deneale, executrix of George Deneale, and others.

Mr Coxe, for the defendants, objected to the writ of error as informal. All the parties to the proceedings in the circuit court should be parties to the writ of error. Those who have not joined in it, are not before the court. The court cannot know who are the persons meant by 'others.'

Mr Lee, for the plaintiff in error, contended, that the record showed who were the parties to the case.

Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was the case of a scire facias against devisees to revive a judgment. The scire facias is in its form without precedent, and a demurrer was filed to it. Process on the scire facias issued against four devisees, and service was made upon two only of them. An office judgment was then taken against all the devisees. The two of them on whom the process was served, afterwards appeared, and the office judgment was set aside as to them, and they then pleaded the statute of limitations. There was a demurrer to the replication and judgment against all the devisees.

The...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Estis v. Trabue
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1888
    ...of the parties by the expression '& Co.,' or the expression 'and others,' or in any other way than by their individual names. Deneale v. Archer, 8 Pet. 526; Heirs of Wilson v. Insurance Co., 12 Pet. 140; Davenport v. Fletcher, 16 How. 142; Mussina v. Cavazos, 6 Wall. 355, 361, 362; Miller v......
  • Walton v. Marietta Chair Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 25, 1895
    ...as 'the heirs' of a person named (Wilson's Heirs v. Insurance Co., 12 Pet. 140); or by the name of one person 'and others' (Deneale v. Stump's Ex'rs, 8 Pet. 526; Davenport v. Fletcher, 16 How. 142; Miller v. McKensie, 10 Wall. 582); or by the name of a person '& Co.' (Mussina v. Cavazos, 6 ......
  • Whitlock v. Willard
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 1, 1881
    ...is "Thomas L. Whitlock vs. T. H. Willard, as sheriff and ex-officio administrator of B. F. Whitlock, et al." In the case of Deneale vs. Stirps' Extrs., 8 Peters 526, writ of error was in the name of "Mary Deneale and others" as plaintiffs. Chief-Justice Marshall for the court, in dismissing......
  • Territory of Hawaii v. Ah Sing
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • September 16, 1907
    ... ... AH SING AND 67 OTHERS. Supreme Court of Territory of Hawai'i.September ... August 30, 1907 ...           ERROR" ... TO CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST CIRCUIT ...    \xC2" ... defendants of being present at a ... gambling game is a ... plaintiffs in error) ...          HARTWELL, ... should be treated as mere surplusage. Deneale v ... Stump, 8 Pet. 526; Bowler v. McIntyre, 9 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free