Maryland State Bar Ass'n, Inc. v. Callanan

• Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
• Writing for the Court: Argued before MURPHY; DIGGES
• Citation: 318 A.2d 809,271 Md. 554
• Decision Date: 02 May 1974
• Parties: MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Robert J. CALLANAN. Misc. (Subtitle BV) 6.

Page 554

271 Md. 554 318 A.2d 809 MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, INC.
v.
Robert J. CALLANAN. Misc. (Subtitle BV) 6. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 2, 1974.

Geoffrey S. Mitchell, Baltimore, for respondent.

Wm. B. Somerville, Baltimore, for Maryland State Bar Ass's, Inc.

Argued before MURPHY, C. J., and BARNES, ^* SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and ELDRIDGE, JJ.

Page 555

DIGGES, Judge.

Robert J. Callanan, the respondent in this disciplinary proceeding, was admitted to the bar of Maryland in 1951 and since that time has practiced law in Baltimore City. On October 20, 1970 he was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland and subsequently sentenced to six months imprisonment for willfully attempting to evade the payment of almost $31,000 in income taxes due the United States for the years 1962 and 1963. Internal Revenue Code of 1954, § 7201. This conviction was affirmed in United States v. Callanan, 450 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1971). In its opinion, the federal circuit court, having made it clear that to support this conviction the prosecution had to show 'a substantial tax deficiency, an affirmative act by the taxpayer to attempt evasion of the tax, and that the taxpayer acted willfully' (id. at 147), then stated:

'The record discloses that this was not a close case. The government proved that time and again Callanan received fees without recording them in any book of account and indeed often without depositing them in any of his office checking accounts. Callanan's explanations were discredited, and he offered neither his own testimony not the testimony of any accountant to disprove the government's evidence.' Id. at 151.

On May 7, 1973, acting pursuant to Chapter 1100, Subtitle BV, of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, the Maryland State Bar Association filed its petition requesting that disciplinary sanctions be imposed by this Court against Mr. Callanan for these derelictions. In view of this, we directed that the charges be transmitted to the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City for [318 A.2d 810] a hearing by a panel of trial judges. ¹ Rule

Page 556

BV 3 b. On May 22, Mr. Callanan, by his answer, admitted the allegations contained in the Bar Association's petition, agreed that his criminal conviction warranted the imposition of some form of sanction, but urged that mitigating circumstances justified the prescription of no more than a reprimand or short suspension of his license to practice in this State....