Masciandaro v. United States, No. 10–11212.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 565 U.S. 1058,132 S.Ct. 756 (Mem),181 L.Ed.2d 482 |
| Decision Date | 28 November 2011 |
| Parties | Sean MASCIANDARO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Docket Number | No. 10–11212. |
565 U.S. 1058
132 S.Ct. 756 (Mem)
181 L.Ed.2d 482
Sean MASCIANDARO, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 10–11212.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 28, 2011.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
20 practice notes
-
Kachalsky v. Cnty. of Westchester, Docket Nos. 11–3642 (Lead), 11–3962(XAP).
...which prohibits “carrying or possessing a loaded weapon in a motor vehicle” within national park areas), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 756, 181 L.Ed.2d 482 (2011); United States v. Chester, 628 F.3d 673, 683 (4th Cir.2010) (applying intermediate scrutiny to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9)); U......
-
Drake v. Filko, No. 12–1150.
...recognized by the Fourth Circuit in United States v. Masciandaro, 638 F.3d 458, 475 (4th Cir.2011), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 756, 181 L.Ed.2d 482 (2011). Compare also Marzzarella, 614 F.3d at 92 (“[C]ertainly, to some degree, [the Second Amendment] must protect the right of law......
-
Dearth v. Lynch, No. 12–5305.
...458, 470 (4th Cir.) (“[A]s we move outside the home, firearm rights have always been more limited....”), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 756, 181 L.Ed.2d 482 (2011). As already noted, the Supreme Court expressly and repeatedly limited its holding to the “home.” See, e.g., Heller, 554......
-
State v. Deciccio, SC 19104
...[a]mendment right of armed self-defense should require strong justification" [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 756, 181 L. Ed. 2d 482 (2011). Thus, if a statutory provision restricting the use of a particular weapon does not substantially burden conduct pr......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
State v. Deciccio, SC 19104
...[a]mendment right of armed self-defense should require strong justification" [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 756, 181 L. Ed. 2d 482 (2011). Thus, if a statutory provision restricting the use of a particular weapon does not substantially burden conduct pr......
-
Clark v. City of Shawnee, Case No. 15–4965–SAC
...might present"). Accordingly, we reject his facial challenge.United States v. Masciandaro , 638 F.3d 458, 474 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 565 U.S. 1058, 132 S.Ct. 756, 181 L.Ed.2d 482 (2011) ; 228 F.Supp.3d 1225United States v. Chester , 514 Fed.Appx. 393, 395, 2013 WL 1189253, p. *2 (4th Ci......
-
Chief of Police of Worcester v. Holden, SJC–11682.
...degree.” Hightower, 693 F.3d at 74, quoting United States v. Masciandaro, 638 F.3d 458, 475 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 756, 181 L.Ed.2d 482 (2011). After acknowledging that the Constitution allows “some measure [for] regulating handguns,”9 in one of the few definitiv......
-
State v. DeCiccio, No. 19104.
...right of armed self-defense should require strong justification” [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 756, 181 L.Ed.2d 482 (2011). Thus, if a statutory provision restricting the use of a particular weapon does not substantially burden conduct protecte......
Request a trial to view additional results