Mascuilli v. United States, 274

Decision Date22 May 1967
Docket NumberNo. 274,274
Citation87 S.Ct. 1705,18 L.Ed.2d 743,387 U.S. 237
PartiesHelen MASCUILLI v. UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Abraham E. Freedman, Milton M. Borowsky and Martin J. Vigderman, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal, for the United States.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co., 321 U.S. 96, 64 S.Ct. 455, 88 L.Ed. 561; Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U.S. 423, 79 S.Ct. 445, 3 L.Ed.2d 413.

Mr. Justice HARLAN, Mr. Justice STEWART, and Mr. Justice WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
51 cases
  • Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 25 Enero 1971
    ...recover over from the stevedores whose negligence with the winch made the vessel pro tanto unseaworthy. In Mascuilli v. United States, 387 U.S. 237, 87 S.Ct. 1705, 18 L.Ed.2d 743, negligent use of a winch in a loading operation so obviously made the vessel pro tanto unseaworthy that we reve......
  • Earles v. Union Barge Line Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 23 Mayo 1973
    ...and co-worker). Accord, Robichaux v. Kerr McGee Oil Indus. Inc., 376 F.2d 447 (5th Cir. 1967). Although Mascuilli v. United States, 387 U.S. 237, 87 S.Ct. 1705, 18 L.Ed.2d 743 (1967) created confusion in some courts such as the Fourth Circuit in Venable v. A/S Det Forenede Dampskibsselskab,......
  • Candiano v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 4 Diciembre 1967
    ...ground for rehearing is the claim that this court misinterpreted the Supreme Court's decision in Mascuilli v. United States, 387 U.S. 237, 87 S.Ct. 1705, 18 L.Ed.2d 743 (May 22, 1967) in relying upon that decision as a basis for affirmance herein. In my opinion, petitioner claims quite prop......
  • Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 20 Junio 1969
    ...With like simplicity, the argument of the claimants merely anticipated in point of time that which can now be charaterized in terms of Mascuilli41 even though it has come out since the decision below. The Mascuilli is also one of extravagantly simple absolutes. It is the direct one that Mas......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT