Mason v. Acceptance Loan Co., Inc.
Decision Date | 27 September 2002 |
Citation | 850 So.2d 289 |
Parties | Charlie MASON et al. v. ACCEPTANCE LOAN COMPANY, INC., et al. Charlie Thigpen et al. v. Acceptance Loan Company, Inc., et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Jere L. Beasley, W. Daniel Miles III, and C. Lance Gould of Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., Montgomery; Terry L. Butts of Cervera, Ralph & Butts, Troy; and Thomas R. Fields III and Will R. Kelly, Hayneville, for appellants.
Lamar C. Johnson of Gilmore Law Office, Grove Hill, for appellee Acceptance Loan Company, Inc.
W. Michael Atchison, Rik S. Tozzi, and Brian A. Dodd of Starnes & Atchison, L.L.P., Birmingham, for appellee Protective Life Insurance Company.
Bibb Allen and Richard E. Smith of Christian & Small, L.L.P., Birmingham, for appellee CNL Insurance America, Inc.
This is an appeal from an order of the Lowndes Circuit Court granting the defendants' motions to compel arbitration; it involves, among other things, the effect of the plaintiffs' alleged mental retardation on their ability to contract. We affirm.
Charlie Mason, Charlie Thigpen, and others (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the plaintiffs") sued Acceptance Loan Company, Inc., Protective Life Insurance Company, and CNL Insurance America, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendants"), in the Lowndes Circuit Court, asserting various claims2 stemming from the solicitation and sale of insurance to the plaintiffs in conjunction with consumer loans they obtained from Acceptance. Specifically, the plaintiffs purchased credit-life and disability insurance from Protective Life and automobile insurance from CNL. The defendants each filed a motion to compel arbitration, seeking to enforce arbitration agreements signed by the plaintiffs in connection with each consumer loan and each application for insurance. The trial court granted the defendants' motions; this appeal followed.
Our analysis is governed by the following now familiar standards:
American Gen. Fin., Inc. v. Morton, 812 So.2d 282, 284-85 (Ala.2001).
It is undisputed that each plaintiff entered into at least one arbitration agreement and that most of the plaintiffs entered into multiple arbitration agreements. There is also no dispute concerning whether the plaintiffs' claims fall within the scope of those agreements. Instead, the plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in compelling arbitration because, they say, (1) the defendants did not offer sufficient evidence indicating that the transactions substantially affected interstate commerce, (2) the various contracts that contained the arbitration agreements are void under Ala.Code 1975, § 8-1-170, because, they argue, the plaintiffs suffer from mental retardation that renders them "insane," (3) the plaintiffs were fraudulently induced into signing the arbitration agreements, and (4) the arbitration agreements are unconscionable. As discussed below, we find these arguments unpersuasive.
In granting the defendants' motions to compel arbitration, the trial court relied on two uncontroverted affidavits. One of those affidavits was from Leon Michael Schmitt, a vice president of Protective Life. It reads as follows:
The other affidavit was from Doyle Kelly, president of CNL. It states:
Based on these uncontroverted affidavits, we believe that the plaintiffs' purchase of credit-life and disability insurance and automobile insurance in connection with obtaining loans through Acceptance clearly "involved" interstate commerce so as to enforce the arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. ("FAA"). See 9 U.S.C. § 2 ( ). Regarding the application of the FAA in the insurance context, we have held:
In this case, Schmitt's affidavit indicates, among other things, that the plaintiffs' Protective Life insurance policies were issued from and are maintained at Protective Life's office in North Carolina. Similarly, Kelly's affidavit indicates that the plaintiffs' CNL insurance policies were issued from and are maintained at CNL's home office in Macon, Georgia.
Furthermore, it is undisputed that the plaintiffs' transactions with Protective Life and CNL were the result of, and, in fact, were an integral part of, the plaintiffs' loan transactions with Acceptance. The insurance was obtained through Acceptance as a part of a transaction in which the plaintiffs' borrowed money from Acceptance.5 Therefore, because, as stated above, the plaintiffs' transactions with Protective Life and CNL sufficiently "involve" interstate commerce, the transactions with Acceptance must likewise "involve" interstate commerce. See Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Lewis, 813 So.2d 820, 824 (Ala.2001) ( ).
We affirm the trial court's finding that the defendants...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Service Corp. Intern. v. Fulmer
...than just ... the arbitration agreement itself"' is for an arbitrator, rather than a court, to resolve." Mason v. Acceptance Loan Co., Inc., 850 So.2d 289, 294-95 (Ala.2002)13 (quoting NationsBanc Invests., Inc. v. Paramore, 736 So.2d 589, 591 (Ala.1999) (quoting in turn Anniston Lincoln Me......
-
Birmingham News Co. v. Horn
...Co. v. Pearl Grange Fruit Exchange, Inc., 292 F.Supp. 549 (S.D.N.Y.1968)." 598 So.2d at 1380-81. More recently, in Mason v. Acceptance Loan Co., 850 So.2d 289 (Ala.2002), after determining that the FAA was applicable to the arbitration provisions in the agreements between the parties, we co......
-
Anderson v. Ashby
...showing that the plaintiff actually shopped around for an arbitration-free loan. She relies upon the recent cases of Mason v. Acceptance Loan Co., 850 So.2d 289 (Ala. 2002); Vann v. First Community Credit Corp., 834 So.2d 751 (Ala.2002); and Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Lewis, 813 So.2d 820 (Al......
-
Reynolds v. Credit Solutions, Inc.
...Hudson v. Outlet Rental Car Sales, Inc., 876 So.2d 455, 458 (Ala.2003); Oakwood Mobile Homes, 773 So.2d at 460. In Mason v. Acceptance Loan Co., 850 So.2d 289, 295 (Ala.2002), the Alabama Supreme Court noted [W]e follow the reasoning of other courts that limit the holding in Prima Paint Cor......