Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Pistolesi, 11349.

Citation160 F.2d 668
Decision Date02 May 1947
Docket NumberNo. 11349.,11349.
PartiesMASSACHUSETTS MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. PISTOLESI.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)

David Livingston and Louis F. DiResta, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

M. Mitchell Bourquin, John J. Healy, and S. H. Allen, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, HEALY, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company appeals from a judgment on a jury's verdict holding it liable under a double indemnity clause of the insurer's policy, payable to the appellee.

On November 2, 1938, the insurer issued to Norbert H. Pistolesi two life insurance policies — one for $5,000 and the other for $2,000. Mr. Pistolesi died on October 5, 1941, and the ordinary benefits payable under each policy have been satisfied. The claim in suit is based on the double-indemnity feature of the policies.

The question here is whether the appellee, the plaintiff below, has maintained her burden of proof that the accident, which we assume caused the death, produced "a visible contusion or wound on the exterior of the body" of the deceased within the policies' provisions that

"Upon receipt of due proof that the death of the insured occurred * * * as the result of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means, as evidence of which injury (except in case of drowning or of internal injuries revealed by an autopsy) there is a visible contusion or wound on the exterior of the body, and that such death occurred * * * as a direct result thereof, independently and exclusively of all other causes * * *."

On September 14, 1941, three weeks prior to his death, Mr. Pistolesi, aged 39 years, was on board a pleasure yacht, the Eloise. He was traveling hand-over-hand suspended from a wire which was strung between two masts of the boat. He reached for the wire with one hand, missed the wire, so that his body swung around, and he held on to the wire with the other hand. Then he went back to the mast and remained there for a few minutes while his photograph was taken by another guest on the boat. Pistolesi then climbed down the mast to the deck.

From that occasion until his death, Pistolesi intermittently complained of pain in his chest, and on physical effort he perspired freely, his face became pale, and his lips were sometimes blue. He lost his customary vigor, he walked in a shuffling manner, at times his breathing was labored, and his countenance was drawn.

Early in the morning of October 5, 1941, he awakened and complained of severe pain. A Dr. Wagner was called, but before Pistolesi could be removed to a hospital he died.

There was no autopsy. The coroner was not notified. The body was cremated on October 7, 1941. The official death certificate signed by Dr. Wagner stated that the immediate cause of death was "acute myocardial failure due to coronary thrombosis — duration one week."

We assume as correct the appellee's contention that the happenings to Pistolesi on the yacht's rigging accidentally caused coronary thrombosis and, as a result, his death. We do not agree with appellee's contention that either mere sweating or paleness of skin or recurring blueing of the lips of Pistolesi after such exertion constitutes a "visible contusion or wound on the exterior of the body." Appellee gave no evidence of any wound and we think none of a "contusion."

The California Civil Code, Section 1644, provides that "The words of a contract are to be understood in their ordinary and popular sense." In California, insurance policies are so construed. Cf. Greenberg v. Continental Casualty Co., 24 Cal. App.2d 506, 75 P.2d 644, relying on the dictionary definition of the policy's words. The Supreme Court states of dictionary definitions of the word "passenger" that "While for the purposes of judicial decision dictionary definitions often are not controlling, they are at least persuasive that meanings which they do not embrace are not common." Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 292 U.S. 80, 85, 54 S.Ct. 590, 593, 78 L.Ed. 1137.

Webster's New International Dictionary, 2d Ed., defines a "contusion" as "a bruise; and injury attended with more or less disorganization of the subcutaneous tissue and effusion of blood beneath the skin but without breaking the skin." Funk & Wagnall's New Standard Dictionary as

"1. The act of bruising by striking or pounding, or the state of being so bruised; also a pulverizing by beating or pounding.

"2. Surg. A bruise; an injury, as from a blow with a blunt instrument, that does not make an open wound."

The court recognizes that an injured heart may drive less blood to the lips and that they will appear blue, as they did with the deceased just after his strain on the yacht's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Neely v. Martin Eby Construction Co, 12
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1967
    ...Shipping Co., 358 F.2d 609 (C.A.5th Cir.); Lappin v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 337 F.2d 399 (C.A.7th Cir.); Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Pistolesi, 160 F.2d 668 (C.A.9th Cir.). The other circuits had rendered similar decisions prior to Cone. See Ferro Concrete Constr. Co. v. United St......
  • Burns v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co., 251.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • September 20, 1948
    ...Kirkby v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 6 Cir., 35 F.2d 126; Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co., 7 Cir., 161 F.2d 852; Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Pistolesi, 9 Cir., 160 F.2d 668; Kingsley v. American Central Life Ins. Co., 259 Mich. 53, 242 N. W. 836; Ashley v. Agricultural Life Ins. Co. of......
  • Stirk v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York, 4470.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • October 22, 1952
    ...Life Ins. Co. v. Powell, 4 Cir., 74 F.2d 525; Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Sayre, 3 Cir., 79 F.2d 937; Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Pistolesi, 9 Cir., 160 F.2d 668; Travelers Insurance Company v. Ansley, 22 Tenn. App. 456, 124 S.W.2d 37; Paist v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., D.C.E.D......
  • Matsuo Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • January 31, 1957
    ...the words of a contract are to be taken in their ordinary and popular sense. California Civil Code, § 1644; Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Pistolesi, 9 Cir., 160 F.2d 668, certiorari denied, 332 U.S. 759, 68 S.Ct. 59, 92 L.Ed. 345. We believe, however, that common understanding of the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT